Talk:Themsarian/Bipersonal affixes: Difference between revisions

From Linguifex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Have you considered using charts of subject and then object prefixes, rather than a giant combination of both? I've noticed you're bipersonal affixes are really just a subject...")
 
 
(6 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Have you considered using charts of subject and then object prefixes, rather than a giant combination of both? I've noticed you're bipersonal affixes are really just a subject affix+ an object affix.
Have you considered using charts of subject and then object prefixes, rather than a giant combination of both? I've noticed you're bipersonal affixes are really just a subject affix+ an object affix.
[[User:Greatbuddha|Greatbuddha]] ([[User talk:Greatbuddha|talk]]) 15:20, 2 November 2013 (CET)
[[User:Greatbuddha|Greatbuddha]] ([[User talk:Greatbuddha|talk]]) 15:20, 2 November 2013 (CET)
:Thank you for your suggestion. I shall perhaps do so (with a description of rules and irregularities), now that I have come up with a more elegant rule for tones. [[User:Ílchőfti Lēmáthīd|Ílchőfti Lēmáthīd]] ([[User talk:Ílchőfti Lēmáthīd|talk]]) 15:49, 2 November 2013 (CET)

Latest revision as of 09:06, 8 August 2014

Have you considered using charts of subject and then object prefixes, rather than a giant combination of both? I've noticed you're bipersonal affixes are really just a subject affix+ an object affix. Greatbuddha (talk) 15:20, 2 November 2013 (CET)

Thank you for your suggestion. I shall perhaps do so (with a description of rules and irregularities), now that I have come up with a more elegant rule for tones. Ílchőfti Lēmáthīd (talk) 15:49, 2 November 2013 (CET)