Logical language: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Types of conlangs}} | {{Types of conlangs}} | ||
'''Logical languages''' are meant to allow (or enforce) unambiguous statements. They are typically based on predicate logic but can also be based on any system of formal logic. The two best-known logical languages are the predicate languages [[Loglan]] and its successor [[Lojban]]. They both aim to eliminate [[syntactical ambiguity]] and reduce [[semantic ambiguity]] to a minimum. In particular, the [[ | '''Logical languages''' (often abbreviated to '''loglangs''') are meant to allow (or enforce) unambiguous statements. They are typically based on predicate logic but can also be based on any system of formal logic. The two best-known logical languages are the predicate languages [[Loglan]] and its successor [[Lojban]]. They both aim to eliminate [[syntactical ambiguity]] and reduce [[semantic ambiguity]] to a minimum. In particular, the [[Lojban#Grammar|grammar of Lojban]] is carefully engineered to express such predicate logic in an unambiguous manner. | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Latest revision as of 20:51, 9 May 2023
| Part of a series on the |
| Types of conlangs |
|---|
 |
| Classification by |
| Origin |
|
A posteriori language |
| Goal |
|
Artistic language |
| Process |
|
Sketchlang |
Logical languages (often abbreviated to loglangs) are meant to allow (or enforce) unambiguous statements. They are typically based on predicate logic but can also be based on any system of formal logic. The two best-known logical languages are the predicate languages Loglan and its successor Lojban. They both aim to eliminate syntactical ambiguity and reduce semantic ambiguity to a minimum. In particular, the grammar of Lojban is carefully engineered to express such predicate logic in an unambiguous manner.