User:Chrysophylax/Skājamāl: Difference between revisions

m
Line 617: Line 617:
The adjectives of Skájamál are quite peculiar from a sibling perspective - there is no “strong” or “weak” inflection - instead, adjectives are declined for definiteness by a complex process whose origins lie in the ancient addition of a prefix, ''*ja(i)-'', which is usually reflected as ''a-'' before most consonants and disappears before most vowels. However, sound changes and analogical processes make the resultant system quite tricky to navigate.
The adjectives of Skájamál are quite peculiar from a sibling perspective - there is no “strong” or “weak” inflection - instead, adjectives are declined for definiteness by a complex process whose origins lie in the ancient addition of a prefix, ''*ja(i)-'', which is usually reflected as ''a-'' before most consonants and disappears before most vowels. However, sound changes and analogical processes make the resultant system quite tricky to navigate.


'''ulsīnaḥ''' (indef. masc. sg. nom.)
#regular pre-consonantal
 
:'''swēkwaḥ''' vs. '''aswēkwaḥ''' (weak)
'''iulsīnaḥ''' (def. masc. sg. nom.)
#iotation
 
:'''ulsīnaḥ''' vs. '''iulsīnaḥ''' (golden);this results from an original *g being preserved as -j- intervocalically and lost initially.
'''swēkwaḥ''' (indef. masc. sg. nom.)
#lenition
 
:'''bitraḥ''' vs. '''avitraḥ''' (bitter)
'''aswēkwaḥ''' (def. masc. sg. nom.)
#lenition and loss
:'''batistaḥ'''  vs. '''vatistaḥ''' (best)


===sansanaunā===
===sansanaunā===