User:Chrysophylax/Skājamāl: Difference between revisions

m
Line 617: Line 617:
The adjectives of Skájamál are quite peculiar from a sibling perspective - there is no “strong” or “weak” inflection - instead, adjectives are declined for definiteness by a complex process whose origins lie in the ancient addition of a prefix, ''*ja(i)-'', which is usually reflected as ''a-'' before most consonants and disappears before most vowels. However, sound changes and analogical processes make the resultant system quite tricky to navigate.
The adjectives of Skájamál are quite peculiar from a sibling perspective - there is no “strong” or “weak” inflection - instead, adjectives are declined for definiteness by a complex process whose origins lie in the ancient addition of a prefix, ''*ja(i)-'', which is usually reflected as ''a-'' before most consonants and disappears before most vowels. However, sound changes and analogical processes make the resultant system quite tricky to navigate.


#regular pre-consonantal
#preserved pre-consonantal a-
:'''swēkwaḥ''' vs. '''aswēkwaḥ''' (weak)
:'''swēkwaḥ''' vs. '''aswēkwaḥ''' (weak)
#iotation
#iotation and loss
:'''ulsīnaḥ''' vs. '''iulsīnaḥ''' (golden);this results from an original *g being preserved as -j- intervocalically and lost initially.
:'''ulsīnaḥ''' vs. '''iulsīnaḥ''' (golden);this results from an original *g being preserved as -j- intervocalically and lost initially.
#lenition
#preserved lenition
:'''bitraḥ''' vs. '''avitraḥ''' (bitter)
:'''bitraḥ''' vs. '''avitraḥ''' (bitter)
#lenition and loss
#lenition and loss