User:Chrysophylax/Golden Afroasiatic: Difference between revisions

m
Line 121: Line 121:
? Semitic + Berber + Cushitic share t- with the meaning of fem.  
? Semitic + Berber + Cushitic share t- with the meaning of fem.  
however, Sem. shows bits of noun classes which are somewhat shared. Can we project to PAA?
however, Sem. shows bits of noun classes which are somewhat shared. Can we project to PAA?
*''*-b'' ~ wild/dangerous animals (missing in Chadic and Cushitic).  
*''*-b'' ~ wild/dangerous animals (missing partially in Chadic and Cushitic but then again that can be said for any of these affixes it seems, everyone randomly lacks one).  
*''*-r~l'' seems to have been for domestic/tame animals, cf. Egyp. ''3-bw'' “elephant” , ''iy-r'' “deer”, ''s-rw'' “sheep”, ''d-b'' “hippo” ~ Cushitic ''ló-ba'' (same meaning, for d~l alternation, see above), Cush.
*''*-r~l'' seems to have been for domestic/tame animals, cf. Egyp. ''3-bw'' “elephant” , ''iy-r'' “deer”, ''s-rw'' “sheep”, ''d-b'' “hippo” ~ Cushitic ''ló-ba'' (same meaning, for d~l alternation, see above), Cush.
''zab-bä'' “lion” (wild) vs. ''dáb-el'' “goat“ (tame)
''zab-bä'' “lion” (wild) vs. ''dáb-el'' “goat“ (tame)