Schlaub/Future: Difference between revisions

From Linguifex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Created by Cole (''Ntzog Schlaub Nlab''?) Spoken in ~3000 fT, might really be the most mathematical future Trician language? Borrow from Goptjaam's sentence trees Borrow mathematics words from Quintlanic (WIP conlang by me)? This would have nine tones instead of 7")
 
mNo edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Created by Cole
Created by Cole


(''Ntzog Schlaub Nlab''?)
(THIS IS A SKETCH)
 
(''Ntzog Schlaub Nlab''?) probably created by mathematicians, particle physicists, and programmers


Spoken in ~3000 fT, might really be the most mathematical future Trician language?
Spoken in ~3000 fT, might really be the most mathematical future Trician language?


Borrow from Goptjaam's sentence trees
Borrow set theory and grammatical words from Quintlanic (WIP conlang by me), and borrow notions of classes and functions?


Borrow mathematics words from Quintlanic (WIP conlang by me)?
This would have nine tones instead of 7


This would have nine tones instead of 7
Part-logographic part-featural? This would explain the 'logographs' (mathematical symbols)

Latest revision as of 11:18, 4 December 2024

Created by Cole

(THIS IS A SKETCH)

(Ntzog Schlaub Nlab?) probably created by mathematicians, particle physicists, and programmers

Spoken in ~3000 fT, might really be the most mathematical future Trician language?

Borrow set theory and grammatical words from Quintlanic (WIP conlang by me), and borrow notions of classes and functions?

This would have nine tones instead of 7

Part-logographic part-featural? This would explain the 'logographs' (mathematical symbols)