Da: Difference between revisions

1 byte removed ,  20 January 2017
m
Text replacement - "Category:Conlangs" to "Category:Languages"
m (Text replacement - "Category:Conlangs" to "Category:Languages")
 
(19 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 57: Line 57:
- Accented vowels á, é, í, ó, ú are long: /a: e: i: o: u:/
- Accented vowels á, é, í, ó, ú are long: /a: e: i: o: u:/


Da words are stressed on the last <b>root</b> vowel. Most often, this turns out to be the penultimate syllable, or the last syllable if the word ends with a consonant. In a multi-syllable word, when the stress falls in an unusual place, it is sometimes denoted by an accent: á, é, í, ó, ú. (We will do this more often here than what is usually seen in Da texts, where accents may be omitted altogether.) Stress can play a distinctive role: e.g. compare ''hotei'' "when?" and ''hotti'' "where to?".
Da words are stressed on the last <b>root</b> vowel. Most often, this turns out to be the penultimate syllable, or the last syllable if the word ends with a consonant. In a multi-syllable word, when the stress falls in an unusual place, it is sometimes denoted by an accent: á, é, í, ó, ú. We will do this more often here than what is usually seen in Da texts, where accents may be omitted altogether.


=Phonotactics=
=Phonotactics=
Line 67: Line 67:
| I am learning Da.
| I am learning Da.
|-
|-
|''Panudátú lussa pankoru kai, Tu harsa luis Meru kei Tuo kartú daisia Tú snít o át mou panteo.''
|''Panudátú lussa pankoru kai, Tu harsa luis Meru kei Tuo kartú daisia Tú emnít o át mou panteo.''
|The Lord so loved the world...
|The Lord so loved the world...
|-
|-
Line 80: Line 80:
Da is an SVO language. Verbs are placed after the subject, adjectives follow the noun, and adverbs follow the verb.
Da is an SVO language. Verbs are placed after the subject, adjectives follow the noun, and adverbs follow the verb.


It is not uncommon, however, to place a word or phrase in front of the sentence for additional emphasis. E.g. one would say ''Kasunotei du mí kasisháohuit'' (Today I am going to the store) instead of ''Du mí kasisháohuit kasunotei'' (I am going to the store today).
It is not uncommon, however, to place a word or phrase in front of the sentence for additional emphasis. E.g. one would say ''Kasunotei du mí kamisháohuit'' (Today I am going to the store) instead of ''Du mí kamisháohuit kasunotei'' (I am going to the store today).


Da adjectives are virtually indistinguishable from intransitive verbs.
Da adjectives are virtually indistinguishable from intransitive verbs.
Line 92: Line 92:
A noun in Nominative has zero ending: ''su'' (water),'' dunotó'' (toy), ''punsé'' (tree), ''koixmihan'' (airplane). Note that with words in Nominative, the stress is always on the last syllable.
A noun in Nominative has zero ending: ''su'' (water),'' dunotó'' (toy), ''punsé'' (tree), ''koixmihan'' (airplane). Note that with words in Nominative, the stress is always on the last syllable.


Composite verbs may have several subjects, all in nominative. This usually applies to causative verbs.
Composite verbs may have several subjects, all in nominative (this usually applies to causative verbs) as well as several direct objects.


Nominative is also used for the subjects of a sentence or a subordinate clause.
Nominative is also used for the subjects of a sentence or a subordinate clause.
Line 103: Line 103:
For example, the verb ''mia'' (to move) may take an object -- the thing that is being moved. Therefore, the composite verb ''daimia'' (to think, lit. "to move in one's head") also takes a direct object, and, unlike in English, the phrase ''Du daimia kú'' (I am thinking '''of''' you) needs no prepositions.
For example, the verb ''mia'' (to move) may take an object -- the thing that is being moved. Therefore, the composite verb ''daimia'' (to think, lit. "to move in one's head") also takes a direct object, and, unlike in English, the phrase ''Du daimia kú'' (I am thinking '''of''' you) needs no prepositions.


On the other hand, the verb ''sáttí'' (to learn, lit: "to come to know") has the second root ''tí'' (to come, to become) which in this form is intransitive (the transitive form of ''tia'' means "to bring") and the first root sá (to know). Therefore, ''sáttí'' should also have one direct object, and in ''Du sáttí Dau'' (I am learning Da) no adverbial is required before ''Dau''.
On the other hand, the verb ''sáttí'' (to learn, lit: "to come to know") has the second root ''tí'' (to come, to become) which in this form is intransitive (the transitive form of ''tia'' means "to bring") and the first root sá (to know). Therefore, ''sáttí'' should also have one direct object, which is grammatically "attaching" to its first part, and in ''Du sáttí Dau'' (I am learning Da) no adverbial is required before ''Dau''.


====''Genitive''====
====''Genitive''====
Line 143: Line 143:
In particular, when used with Locative, ''-t-'', ''-s-'' and ''-x-'' attach after the locative marker and have the meaning of "to", "from" and "through", respectively. E.g. ''Du mí hui'''t''''' (I go home) vs. ''Du mí hui'''s''''' (I am leaving home) vs. ''Du mí nomimi'''x''''' (I am walking on a path); ''Karmel nessa taoruru dei'''t''' taolono'' (She put the pencil on the desk) vs. ''Karmel hassa taoruru dei'''s''' taolono'' (She took the pencil from the desk), etc.
In particular, when used with Locative, ''-t-'', ''-s-'' and ''-x-'' attach after the locative marker and have the meaning of "to", "from" and "through", respectively. E.g. ''Du mí hui'''t''''' (I go home) vs. ''Du mí hui'''s''''' (I am leaving home) vs. ''Du mí nomimi'''x''''' (I am walking on a path); ''Karmel nessa taoruru dei'''t''' taolono'' (She put the pencil on the desk) vs. ''Karmel hassa taoruru dei'''s''' taolono'' (She took the pencil from the desk), etc.


''-s-'' and ''-t-'' are doubled when they are used as infixes after a vowel.  
''-s-'', ''-t-'' and ''-x-'' are doubled when they are used as infixes after a vowel.  


''-s-'' and ''-t-'' can also be used with Genitive (e.g. ''huomen duo'' "my husband" vs. ''huomen du'''ss'''o'' "my ex-husband") but such usage is more rare.
''-s-'' and ''-t-'' can also be used with Genitive (e.g. ''huomen duo'' "my husband" vs. ''huomen du'''ss'''o'' "my ex-husband") but such usage is more rare.
Line 150: Line 150:


===Verb===
===Verb===
Verbs in Cha receive the endings ''-a'' (transitive) and "-e" (intransitive). As with other endings, if the root ends with the same vowel, it is not duplicated but receives the accent instead. Verbs do not conjugate.
Verbs in Da receive the endings ''-a'' (transitive) and "-i" (intransitive). As with other endings, if the root ends with the same vowel, it is not duplicated but receives the accent instead. Verbs do not conjugate.


A large percentage of Cha verbs are ergative and change their meaning depending on whether they are used as transitive or intransitive verbs. For example: ''mie / mia'' (vi: goes, vt: moves /something/), ''tí'' / ''tia'' (vi: comes, vt: brings /something/), ''keli / kela'' (vi: errs, vt: breaks /something/) etc.
A large percentage of Da verbs are ergative and change their meaning depending on whether they are used as transitive or intransitive verbs. For example: ''/ mia'' (vi: goes, vt: moves /something/), ''tí'' / ''tia'' (vi: comes, vt: brings /something/), ''keli / kela'' (vi: errs, vt: breaks /something/) etc.


Similarly, many verbs have a different meaning when used as ''modal'' verbs, that is, verbs followed by a ''t-''-adverbial. E.g. the word ''xí'', when used as an adjective, means "necessary", but the meaning is changed to "need, have to" when it is used as a modal verb: ''pa xí'' "necessary work" --> ''to xío pat'' "what has to be done".  
Similarly, many verbs have a different meaning when used as ''modal'' verbs, that is, verbs followed by a ''t-''-adverbial. E.g. the word ''xí'', when used as an adjective, means "necessary", but the meaning is changed to "need, have to" when it is used as a modal verb: ''pa xí'' "necessary work" --> ''to xío pat'' "what has to be done".  
Line 158: Line 158:
There are no verb tenses in Da, but there are aspects. Unmodified verbs are assumed to be in imperfective aspect. The infixes ''-t-'' and ''-x-'' put them into prospective and perfective aspects, signifying the action that is about to start or has been completed. Quite often these aspects are translated into other languages using future and past tenses: ''Du si'''ss'''a tou síotenoxui duo!'' (I have seen it with my own two eyes!) or ''Ku kam'''t'''i pas katou!'' (You will pay for (doing) this!). On the other hand, a narrative like ''Palsunotei moi korudamen pali...'' (Once upon a time there lived a king...) usually does not require an aspect change.
There are no verb tenses in Da, but there are aspects. Unmodified verbs are assumed to be in imperfective aspect. The infixes ''-t-'' and ''-x-'' put them into prospective and perfective aspects, signifying the action that is about to start or has been completed. Quite often these aspects are translated into other languages using future and past tenses: ''Du si'''ss'''a tou síotenoxui duo!'' (I have seen it with my own two eyes!) or ''Ku kam'''t'''i pas katou!'' (You will pay for (doing) this!). On the other hand, a narrative like ''Palsunotei moi korudamen pali...'' (Once upon a time there lived a king...) usually does not require an aspect change.


The infix ''-k-'' produces the progressive aspect: compare ''Du maka sunoteoporomau katei'' (I am eating lunch now) and ''Du má honokanu sunotei pani'' (I eat meat every day).
The infix ''-x-'' produces the progressive aspect: compare ''Du maxxa sunoteoporomau katei'' (I am eating lunch now) and ''Du má honokanu sunotei pani'' (I eat meat every day).


The prospective aspect is also used as imperative: ''Titti kanait!'' "Come here!"
The prospective aspect is also used as imperative: ''Titti kanait!'' "Come here!"
Line 168: Line 168:


===Intransitive Verbs as Adjectives===
===Intransitive Verbs as Adjectives===
Cha adjectives, from the grammatical point of view, do not differ from intransitive verbs. In a way, all Da adjectives are participles. They end with ''-i'' and go after the noun.
Da adjectives, from the grammatical point of view, do not differ from intransitive verbs. In a way, all Da adjectives are participles. They end with ''-i'' and go after the noun.


Adjectives often play the role of a verb in a sentence, requiring no copula. For example, ''losí'' (beautiful) can be used in ''Ku nunmelo losí'' (You are a beautiful girl) as well as ''Nunmel ká losí roi'' (This girl is very beautiful).
Adjectives often play the role of a verb in a sentence, requiring no copula. For example, ''losí'' (beautiful) can be used in ''Ku nunmelo losí'' (You are a beautiful girl) as well as ''Nunmel ká losí roi'' (This girl is very beautiful).
Line 219: Line 219:
''Du sai ku ríssiu du tonathiat paltou'' -- I know you wanted to tell me something (compare with: ''Ku rissi du tonathiat paltou'' "You wanted to tell me something" and ''Du tonta paltou'' "I will hear something").
''Du sai ku ríssiu du tonathiat paltou'' -- I know you wanted to tell me something (compare with: ''Ku rissi du tonathiat paltou'' "You wanted to tell me something" and ''Du tonta paltou'' "I will hear something").


''John maxi té xentú tuo tío huit'' -- John was eating when his friend entered the house (compare with ''Xentú tuo tí huit'' "His friend enters the house").
''John maxxi té xentú tuo tío huit'' -- John was eating when his friend entered the house (compare with ''Xentú tuo tí huit'' "His friend enters the house").


The case in which the supine is placed determines the relationship between the main word and the subordinate clause:
The case in which the supine is placed determines the relationship between the main word and the subordinate clause:
Line 242: Line 242:
Cha roots do not have an inherent part of speech attached to them; instead, each root word can freely transition between different parts of speech, and often has a separate meaning when it is used as a noun, verb etc. Of course all these meanings are closely related. Let us give just a couple of examples:
Cha roots do not have an inherent part of speech attached to them; instead, each root word can freely transition between different parts of speech, and often has a separate meaning when it is used as a noun, verb etc. Of course all these meanings are closely related. Let us give just a couple of examples:


{| class="wikitable" border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width: 230px"
{| class="wikitable" border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width: 300px"
|+'''Root ''de'''''
|+'''Root ''de'''''
|'''Form'''
|'''Form'''
Line 257: Line 257:
|-
|-
|''deit''
|''deit''
|up
|up, onto
|Adverb
|Adverb
|-
|-
|''dei''
|''dei''
|on
|on, above (also ''denai'')
|Noun in Locative
|Noun in Locative
|-
|-
|''deit''
|''deix''
|onto
|over
|Noun in Locative
|Noun in Locative
|-
|''dei''
|above, over
|Adverb
|-
|-
|''de''
|''de''
Line 284: Line 280:
|'''Part of speech'''
|'''Part of speech'''
|-
|-
|kela
|keli
|wrong
|wrong
|Adjective
|Adjective
|-
|-
|kela
|keli
|err (be wrong)
|err (be wrong)
|Intransitive Verb
|Intransitive Verb
Line 312: Line 308:
|'''Part of speech'''
|'''Part of speech'''
|-
|-
|nea
|nei
|be inside
|be inside
|Intransitive Verb
|Intransitive Verb
|-
|-
|nea
|nei
|inner
|inner
|Adjective
|Adjective
|-
|-
|
|nei
|in
|in (also ''nenai'')
|Noun in Locative
|Noun in Locative
|-
|-
|nete
|neit
|into
|into
|Noun in Locative
|Noun in Locative
Line 344: Line 340:
Note that when a composite word is is used as certain part of speech, its meaning is always related to the last root's meaning for this part of speech.
Note that when a composite word is is used as certain part of speech, its meaning is always related to the last root's meaning for this part of speech.


For example, the English noun "face" is translated into Cha as ''tyaosó'', lit. "the front of head". The same English word can be used as a verb, meaning, depending on context, "to meet face-to-face" or "to confront".
For example, the English noun "face" is translated into Da as ''daosó'', lit. "the front of head". The same English word can be used as a verb, meaning, depending on context, "to meet face-to-face" or "to confront".  


The Cha verb ''soa'', however, means "to advance" and any verb ending with ''soa'' is expected to have a related meaning. Therefore, the English "to face" cannot be expressed by just using ''tyaosó'' as a verb. Indeed, one has to say ''sotetia'' (lit. "come to the front") or ''sousittia'' (lit. "come to see the face") or a similar verb.
The Da verb ''soi'', however, means "to advance" and any verb ending with ''soi'' is expected to have a related meaning. Therefore, the English "to face" cannot be expressed by just using ''daosó'' as a verb. Indeed, one has to say ''soittí'' (lit. "come to the front") or ''sousiattí'' (lit. "come to see the face") or a similar verb.


===Composite Words===
===Composite Words===
Line 354: Line 350:
Cha composite word is a little phrase fused together into a word. The individual parts of a composite word relate to each other using the same morphemes as those used to link words in a sentence.
Cha composite word is a little phrase fused together into a word. The individual parts of a composite word relate to each other using the same morphemes as those used to link words in a sentence.


Examples start with very simple words: ''te suno'' "time of light" --> ''sunoté'' "day, daytime"; ''se puna'' "hard plant" --> ''punsé'' "tree"; ''mel nuna'' "young woman" --> ''nunmel'' "girl"; ''han mia'' "moving vessel" --> ''mihan'' "car" and so forth.
Examples start with very simple words: ''te suno'' "time of light" --> ''sunoté'' "day, daytime"; ''se puni'' "hard plant" --> ''punsé'' "tree"; ''mel nuni'' "young woman" --> ''nunmel'' "girl"; ''han '' "moving vessel" --> ''mihan'' "car" and so forth.


Here we need to stress a couple of very important points that are essential for understanding how composite words work in Cha.
Here we need to stress a couple of very important points that are essential for understanding how composite words work in Da.


1. '''A composite word is not "equal" to the meaning of the phrase that was used to build it.''' ''Mel nuna'' means just that, a young woman; it does not mean "girl", while ''nunmel'' means "girl" but not "a young woman". '''Fusing a phrase into a composite word gives it additional idiomatic meaning.''' You can often guess what that meaning is, and thus deduce the meaning of the word; but, when in doubt, one should turn to a dictionary.
1. '''A composite word is not "equal" to the meaning of the phrase that was used to build it.''' ''Mel nuni'' means just that, a young woman; it does not mean "girl", while ''nunmel'' means "girl" but not "a young woman". '''Fusing a phrase into a composite word gives it additional idiomatic meaning.''' You can often guess what that meaning is, and thus deduce the meaning of the word; but, when in doubt, one should turn to a dictionary.


The same goes about word creation: one cannot expect to throw a bunch of words together and hope to create a word that another Cha speaker will understand.
The same goes about word creation: one cannot expect to throw a bunch of words together and hope to create a word that another Da speaker will understand.


In short, knowing etymology of composite words helps one memorize them and helps to understand a new word one has never heard before. But that does not mean one can skip the dictionary altogether.
In short, knowing etymology of composite words helps one memorize them and helps to understand a new word one has never heard before. But that does not mean one can skip the dictionary altogether.


2. '''Composite words in Cha are not just a bunch of roots thrown together.''' The infixes and endings needed to link those roots together in a phrase are retained in the composite word, making its meaning much more clear.
2. '''Composite words in Da are not just a bunch of roots thrown together.''' The infixes and endings needed to link those roots together in a phrase are retained in the composite word, making its meaning much more clear.


For example, the Cha word for "learn", ''sattia'', is comprised of two root-words, ''sá'' "know" and ''tia'' "come, become". However, you don't simply put these two together and let everyone guess the relationship of the two (come knowing? come for knowledge?). Instead, you create a phrase, ''tia sati'' "come to know" and only then turn it into a composite word, ''sattia''.
For example, the Cha word for "learn", ''sáttí'', is comprised of two root-words, ''sá'' "know" and '''' "come, become". However, you don't simply put these two together and let everyone guess the relationship of the two (come knowing? come for knowledge?). Instead, you create a phrase, ''tí sát'' "come to know" and only then turn it into a composite word, ''sáttí''.


On the other hand, the word for "buy" is composed of two roots, ''kasa'' "pay" and ''há'' "take". The relationship between those if different: you take things because you have paid for them. Therefore, the phrase that is used to describe this is ''há kaspi'', and the word for "buy" is ''kasphá''.
On the other hand, the word for "buy" is composed of two roots, ''kasa'' "pay" and ''há'' "take". The relationship between those if different: you take things because you have paid for them. Therefore, the phrase that is used to describe this is ''há kasas'', and the word for "buy" is ''kasashá''.


To have another example illustrating the importance of links between roots in a composite word, let us consider words ''tyerttia'' and ''tyertetia''. The first is composed from the phrase ''tia tyerti'', "become lower" and means "diminish". The second, however, has its root in the phrase ''tia tyerte'', "come down", and means "to descend".
To have another example illustrating the importance of links between roots in a composite word, let us consider words ''derittí'' and ''dernaittí''. The first is composed from the phrase ''tí derit'', "become lower" and means "diminish". The second, however, has its root in the phrase ''tí nait deri'', "come down", and means "to descend".


There are two easy rules describing how composite words are constructed in Cha:
There are two easy rules describing how composite words are constructed in Cha:
Line 376: Line 372:
1. The word order is reversed. While in Cha the main word is usually the first, with adjectives following the nouns, objects and adverbs following the verbs etc, in the composite word the main root is always the last part.
1. The word order is reversed. While in Cha the main word is usually the first, with adjectives following the nouns, objects and adverbs following the verbs etc, in the composite word the main root is always the last part.


2. Adjectives, verbs and adverbs lose their endings (''-a'' and ''-i'') when they become a part of a composite word (supines do not lose the final '-a'!). Those endings, however, are most of the time easily reconstructed (adjectives modify nouns, while adverbs modify verbs).
2. Adjectives, verbs and adverbs lose their endings ''-i'' when they become a part of a composite word (supines do not lose the final '-i'!). Those endings, however, are most of the time easily reconstructed (adjectives modify nouns, while adverbs modify verbs).


Let us give you a couple more examples:
Let us give you a couple more examples:
Line 385: Line 381:
''tira saraotú'' "drive strangers away"<br /> --> ''saraotutira'' "guard"
''tira saraotú'' "drive strangers away"<br /> --> ''saraotutira'' "guard"


''hon saraotutira'' "guard animal"<br /> --> ''saraotutirhon'' "a dog"
''hon saraotutira'' "guard animal"<br /> --> ''saraotutirahon'' "a dog"
|
|
''han mia'' "moving vessel"<br /> --> ''mihan'' "car"
''han '' "moving vessel"<br /> --> ''mihan'' "car"


''mia tyeke kó'' "move through the height of air"<br /> --> ''kotyekemia'' "fly"
''mi koix'' "move through the height of air"<br /> --> ''koixmí'' "fly"


''mihan kotyekemia'' "flying car"<br /> --> ''kotyekemihan'' "airplane"
''mihan koixmí'' "flying car"<br /> --> ''koixmihan'' "airplane"
|}
|}


===Negation===
===Negation===
The Cha word for "no" is ''es''. When it is used with a verb, adjective or noun, it usually loses the initial 'e' and merges with the following word: ''ria'' "want" --> ''sria'' "don't want", ''riao'' "needed, necessary" --> ''sriao'' "unnecessary, extra" etc. The exception to this rule are words beginning with an 's'; with them, the initial 'e' is retained: ''Tyu essipa kú tunotunke pankoteo!'' "I have not seen you for a hundred years!".
The Da word for "no" is ''em''. When it is used with a verb, adjective or noun, it usually loses the initial 'e' and merges with the following word: ''ria'' "want" --> ''m'ria'' "don't want", ''riao'' "needed, necessary" --> ''m'riao'' "unnecessary, extra" etc. The exception to this rule are words beginning with an 'l', 'm' or 'n'; with them, the initial 'e' is retained: ''Du emmissi karnait tunotunix pankoteo!'' "I have not been there for a hundred years!".


Double negation is possible for emphasis: ''Ku sipa paltou?'' "Have you seen anything?" -- ''Tyu essipa stou!'' "I saw nothing at all!"
Double negation is possible for emphasis: ''Ku sissa paltou?'' "Have you seen anything?" -- ''Du m'sissa m'tou!'' "I saw nothing at all!"


Along with ''es'', Cha also has a mechanism of forming antonyms, which consists of alternating the last root consonant. To get an antonym, ''-n'' alternates with ''-l'' and ''-r'' alternates with no consonant. For example:
Along with ''em'', Cha also has a mechanism of forming antonyms, which consists of alternating the last root consonant. To get an antonym, ''-n'' alternates with ''-l'' and ''-r'' alternates with no consonant. For example:


''lua'' "love" <--> ''lura'' "hate"
''lua'' "love" <--> ''lura'' "hate"


''tye'' "top" <--> ''tyer'' "bottom"
''de'' "top" <--> ''der'' "bottom"


''kela'' "wrong / break" <--> ''kena'' "right / fix"
''keli/kela'' "wrong / break" <--> ''keni/kena'' "right / fix"


''on'' "many, plenty" <--> ''ol'' "few, little"
''on'' "many, plenty" <--> ''ol'' "few, little"


and so forth. Of course, negatives and antonyms have very different semantics: ''lura'' "hate" is not quite the same as ''slua'' "not love".
and so forth. Of course, negatives and antonyms have very different semantics: ''lura'' "hate" is not quite the same as ''emlua'' "not love".


===Plural and Numbers===
===Plural and Numbers===
When a Cha speaker wants to say "two chairs", "three tables" and so on, she uses an expression similar to English "a pair of chairs": ''syu soruraolono'', ''sas maolono'' (lit. "pair of chairs", "trio of tables"). The numeral is grammatically a noun ("pair", "trio", "dozen") and is followed by Genitive.
When a Cha speaker wants to say "two chairs", "three tables" and so on, she uses an expression similar to English "a pair of chairs": ''xu soruraolono'', ''sam maolono'' (lit. "pair of chairs", "trio of tables"). The numeral is grammatically a noun ("pair", "trio", "dozen") and is followed by Genitive.


Note that when used as adjectives the numerals become ordinal numbers: ''soruraolono syua'' "the second chair".
Note that when used as adjectives the numerals become ordinal numbers: ''soruraolono xua'' "the second chair".


Often, especially with number two and with paired body parts, the number indicator is merged with the main word: ''siaotenosyú'' (eyes, lit. "pair of eyes"), ''haosyú'' (hands, lit. "pair of hands") etc.
Often, especially with number two and with paired body parts, the number indicator is merged with the main word: ''siaotenoxú'' (eyes, lit. "pair of eyes"), ''haoxú'' (hands, lit. "pair of hands") etc.


"Plurality", or "multiple" is translated into Cha with the use of word ''on''. So if "a person" is ''tu'', then "many persons" is ''on tuo'' (lit. "plurality of persons"). If we merge this expression into a single word, ''tuón'', we get "people". Note that the two "o"s have become one "o" with an accent.
"Plurality", or "multiple" is translated into Cha with the use of word ''on''. So if "a person" is ''tu'', then "many persons" is ''on tuo'' (lit. "plurality of persons"). If we merge this expression into a single word, ''tuón'', we get "people". Note that the two "o"s have become one "o" with an accent.


Using the same method (adding ''-ón'') one can form plural of most any noun. Note however that the plural form will be used when it is not otherwise clear from context that a purality of objects or persons is being referred to. In particular, the plural with ''-ón ''is never used with numbers or words like "some" or "several"; e.g. ''tu pana'' "all people" (NOT <strike>''tuón pana''</strike>)
Using the same method (adding ''-ón'') one can form plural of most any noun. Note however that the plural form will be used when it is not otherwise clear from context that a plurality of objects or persons is being referred to. In particular, the plural with ''-ón ''is never used with numbers or words like "some" or "several"; e.g. ''tu pana'' "all people" (NOT <strike>''tuón pana''</strike>)


===Translating Pronouns===
===Translating Pronouns===
Line 430: Line 426:
|-
|-
|'''I'''
|'''I'''
|''tyu''
|''du''
|''tyuón, tyuosyú, tyuotuón'',
|''duón, duoxú, duotuón'',
|-
|-
|'''II'''
|'''II'''
|''ku''
|''ku''
|''kuón, kuosyú, kuotuón''
|''kuón, kuoxú, kuotuón''
|-
|-
|'''III'''
|'''III'''
Line 443: Line 439:
As you can see, Cha speakers use words "man", "woman", "person" and "thing" as 3-rd person pronouns. It is more frequent however to see words ''karmen'', ''karmel'' ("''that'' man", "''that'' woman") and so forth. The use of ''kar-'' and ''ka-'' depends on where the referred persons or objects are.
As you can see, Cha speakers use words "man", "woman", "person" and "thing" as 3-rd person pronouns. It is more frequent however to see words ''karmen'', ''karmel'' ("''that'' man", "''that'' woman") and so forth. The use of ''kar-'' and ''ka-'' depends on where the referred persons or objects are.


The 1-st and 2-nd person plural pronouns have full forms that losely correspond to phrases like "my people" and "your people"; however, short forms ''tyuón'' and ''kuón'' are most frequently used. Instead of the plural with ''-ón'', one often can hear ''tyuosyú,'' ''kuosyú'' and ''tuosyú'' (lit. "the pair of us", "the pair of you" or "pair of them").
The 1-st and 2-nd person plural pronouns have full forms that losely correspond to phrases like "my people" and "your people"; however, short forms ''duón'' and ''kuón'' are most frequently used. Instead of the plural with ''-ón'', one often can hear ''duoxú,'' ''kuoxú'' and ''tuoxú'' (lit. "the pair of us", "the pair of you" or "pair of them").


Putting personal pronouns into Genitive produces possessive pronouns: ''tyuo'' (mine, lit. "of me"), ''meno'' (his) etc. When one needs to underscore possession, the verb ''á'' (have) can be fused in, e.g. ''tyuao'' (mine, that is belonging to me).
Putting personal pronouns into Genitive produces possessive pronouns: ''duo'' (mine, lit. "of me"), ''meno'' (his) etc. When one needs to underscore possession, the verb ''á'' (have) can be fused in, e.g. ''duáo'' (mine, that is belonging to me).


====Demonstrative, Interrogative and Negative Pronouns====
====Demonstrative, Interrogative and Negative Pronouns====
Demonstrative, interrogative, negative (and no on) pronouns are usually expressed by putting words like ''ka'' (this), ''kar'' (that), ''ho'' (what? which?), ''es'' (no, none), ''pan'' (all), ''pal'' (some) into different cases, or fusing them with words like ''te'' (time), ''na'' (place), ''tu'' (person), ''to'' (thing) etc. For example:
Demonstrative, interrogative, negative (and no on) pronouns are usually expressed by putting words like ''ka'' (this), ''kar'' (that), ''ho'' (what? which?), ''em'' (no, none), ''pan'' (all), ''pal'' (some) into different cases, or fusing them with words like ''te'' (time), ''na'' (place), ''tu'' (person), ''to'' (thing) etc. For example:


''Hotú'' "who?", ''hoté'' "when?", ''hoe, honae'' "where?", ''hope'' "where from?", ''hote'' "where to?", ''hotepe'' "since when?", ''hoi'' "how?", ''hopi'' "why?", ''hoti'' "what for?"
''Hotú'' "who?", ''hotei'' "when?", ''honai'' "where?", ''honais'' "where from?", ''honait'' "where to?", ''hoteis'' "since when?", ''hoi'' "how?", ''hois'' "why?", ''hoit'' "what for?"


''Kató'' "this", ''katé'' "now", ''kae, kanae'' "here", ''kape'' "from here", ''kate'' "(to) here", ''katepe'' "since now", ''kai'' "this way" etc.
''Kató'' "this", ''katei'' "now", ''kanai'' "here", ''kanais'' "from here", ''kanait'' "(to) here", ''kateis'' "since now", ''kai'' "this way" etc.


''Kartó'' "that", ''karté'' then, and so on.
''Kartó'' "that", ''karté'' then, and so on.
Line 458: Line 454:
Here are some usage examples:
Here are some usage examples:


''Hoi ku papa karu?'' How did you do that?
''Hoi ku passa karu?'' How did you do that?


''Hoté ku napa kare?'' When have you been there?
''Hotei ku nassi karnai?'' When have you been there?


''Hoe ku napa?" Where have you been?
''Hoi ku nassi?" Where have you been?


''Hope ku tia?'' Where do you come from?
''Honais ku ?'' Where do you come from?


''Hopi ku mia karte?'' Why do you go there?
''Hois ku mí karnait?'' Why do you go there?


''Hoti ku mika karte?'' What for do you keep going there?
''Hoit ku mixi karnait?'' What for do you keep going there?


===Degrees of Adjectives and Adverbs===
===Degrees of Adjectives and Adverbs===
To compare two qualities, Cha speakers use words ''tyoi'' (more), ''tyori'' (less) and '''' (looking at, comparing with). ''Tyoi''  and ''tyori'' are usually fused with the adjectives, forming a comparative form:
To compare two qualities, Da speakers use words ''doi'' (more), ''dori'' (less) and ''sia'' (looking at, comparing with). ''Doi''  and ''dori'' are usually fused with the adjectives, forming a comparative form:


''Hu ká tyotyea. Hu ká tyotyea sí kara.'' This house is taller. This house it taller than that house.
''Hu kai dodei. Hu kai dodei sia kari.'' This house is taller. This house it taller than that house.


''Nunmel ká tyorlosia sí nunmelu kara.'' This girl is less beautiful than that girl.
''Nunmel kai dorloís sia nunmelu kari.'' This girl is less beautiful than that girl.


''Tyu romia tyoi sí kú.'' I run faster than you.
''Du romí doi sia kú.'' I run faster than you.


To form the superlative degree, use the word ''panusí'' (overall; lit. "more compared with all"). E.g. ''Ku tyolosia panusí! Ku tyolosia sí melu pana pankoro!'' "You are the most beautiful! You are more beautiful than all women in the world!".
To form the superlative degree, use the word ''panusia'' (overall; lit. "more compared with all"). E.g. ''Ku dolosí panusia! Ku dolosí sia melu pani pankoro!'' "You are the most beautiful! You are more beautiful than all women in the world!".


The word ''sani'' (similarly) is used to compare two qualities that are perceived to be equal. Again, ''sani'' can be fused with the adjective:
The word ''sani'' (similarly) is used to compare two qualities that are perceived to be equal. Again, ''sani'' can be fused with the adjective:


''Tyu morttalpa konkanuluhonu santyoa sani tyekoru.'' I killed a bear as big as a mountian.
''Du morittalsa konkanuluhonu sandoi sani dekoru.'' I killed a bear as big as a mountian.


=Advanced Examples=
=Advanced Examples=
Line 2,723: Line 2,719:


[[Category:Languages]]
[[Category:Languages]]
[[Category:Conlangs]]
[[Category:Languages]]
[[Category:Cha]]
[[Category:Cha]]