Chlouvānem/Calendar and time: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 372: Line 372:
* ''S 2.1Ɛ'' — ''daniendye saṃlallumi māmivælden vi'' (it's twenty-three<sub>10</sub> <small>(two and one dozen plus eleven)</small> in the second of the afternoon)
* ''S 2.1Ɛ'' — ''daniendye saṃlallumi māmivælden vi'' (it's twenty-three<sub>10</sub> <small>(two and one dozen plus eleven)</small> in the second of the afternoon)
* ''S 2.35'' — ''daniendye saṃlallumi lahīla māmišulka (no) vi'' (it's the first [third of hour] and seventeen<sub>10</sub> <small>(one dozen plus five)</small> in the second of the afternoon)
* ''S 2.35'' — ''daniendye saṃlallumi lahīla māmišulka (no) vi'' (it's the first [third of hour] and seventeen<sub>10</sub> <small>(one dozen plus five)</small> in the second of the afternoon)
* ''S 2.48'' — ''daniendye saṃlallumi hælinaika tītya (no) vi'' (it's the second [third of hour] and eight in the second of the afternoon)
* ''S 2.48'' — ''daniendye saṃlallumi hælinaika mbula (no) vi'' (it's the second [third of hour] and eight in the second of the afternoon)


The word ''raila'' is usually never stated if the hour number is present; if it is implied, then ''raila'' (always in the singular, as it's preceded by a numeral) must be stated - note also the question about minutes, not the hour:
The word ''raila'' is usually never stated if the hour number is present; if it is implied, then ''raila'' (always in the singular, as it's preceded by a numeral) must be stated - note also the question about minutes, not the hour: