Talk:Themsarian/Bipersonal affixes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Greatbuddha (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Have you considered using charts of subject and then object prefixes, rather than a giant combination of both? I've noticed you're bipersonal affixes are really just a subject...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Have you considered using charts of subject and then object prefixes, rather than a giant combination of both? I've noticed you're bipersonal affixes are really just a subject affix+ an object affix. | Have you considered using charts of subject and then object prefixes, rather than a giant combination of both? I've noticed you're bipersonal affixes are really just a subject affix+ an object affix. | ||
[[User:Greatbuddha|Greatbuddha]] ([[User talk:Greatbuddha|talk]]) 15:20, 2 November 2013 (CET) | [[User:Greatbuddha|Greatbuddha]] ([[User talk:Greatbuddha|talk]]) 15:20, 2 November 2013 (CET) | ||
:Thank you for your suggestion. I shall perhaps do so (with a list of irregularities), now that I have come up with a more elegant rule for tones. [[User:Ílchőfti Lēmáthīd|Ílchőfti Lēmáthīd]] ([[User talk:Ílchőfti Lēmáthīd|talk]]) 15:49, 2 November 2013 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 14:49, 2 November 2013
Have you considered using charts of subject and then object prefixes, rather than a giant combination of both? I've noticed you're bipersonal affixes are really just a subject affix+ an object affix. Greatbuddha (talk) 15:20, 2 November 2013 (CET)
- Thank you for your suggestion. I shall perhaps do so (with a list of irregularities), now that I have come up with a more elegant rule for tones. Ílchőfti Lēmáthīd (talk) 15:49, 2 November 2013 (CET)