Peshpeg

Introduction

The Peshpeg language, or Peshpeg humbi todak inlak "true humans speak this way", is a highly endangered language in the valleys of the Kilmay Rī Mountains and the prefectures of south-central Minhay. The language is considered moribund: according to the last census, only about ninety fluent speakers remain, all older than sixty years. Younger generations speak only Minhast, from either the Wolf Speaker, Stone Speaker, or City Speaker dialects. Efforts to revitalize the language have been largely unsuccessful; with the exception of the City Speakers, most Minhast are either apathetic or even actively hostile to revitalization efforts. Social and economic discrimination towards the Peshpegs has only accelerated the decline of the language.

Peshpeg is classified as a language isolate. Any similarities to the Minhast language are due to language contact, with most of the influences being unidirectional; only a handful of Peshpeg words, most of them related to the fauna and flora of their original homeland, have been adopted by the Wolf Speaker and Stone Speaker dialects. However, Minhast has had an enormous impact on the Peshpeg language; close to 70% of the Peshpeg lexicon comes from Minhast, and quite notably, the original base-10 numerical system has been supplanted by the vegisimal system of the dominant language. Some linguists have explored the possibility of a relationship with Ín Duári, another endangered, non-Minhast language, but plausible evidence for such a relationship has not been demonstrated.

Peshpeg is classified as an SOV language. The language apparently had an extensive vowel harmony system, which has been preserved to some extent in its present-day form. Aggluginative and fusional features appear in various areas of the grammar.

The language is head initial: modifiers such as adjectives usually follow their head noun; prepositions are used in adpositional phrases, and relative clauses follow the NP they modify, attributes associated with head-initial languages. Once again, however, the influence of Minhast has introduced a certain level of fluidity, such as numerical modifiers precede their noun heads; this was probably facilitated by the replacement of the original decimal system with Minhast's vegisimal system.

Phonology

Orthography

Fragmentary inscriptions, thus far undeciphered, have been found in ruins scattered throughout Nasket Prefecture in Dog Speaker Country. This area is known for pre-Minhast settlements, and was occupied by the Peshpegs according to their oral history before they were displaced by Minhast invaders. However, the Ín Duári also claim the area as part of their original homeland. The heritage of the inscriptions thus remains in doubt.

The Širkattarnaft was eventually adopted by the Peshpegs, to which they added diacritics and additional vowel signs to represent sounds not represented in the original orthography. During the late 1870's, an Evangelist missionary, Aldous Green Huntly, sneaked into Minhay aboard a Chinese merchant vessel returning from the United States. Hounded by hostile Gull Speakers who discovered him in the port city of Kissamut, he fled west, skirting around the major villages in Dog Speaker Country until he stumbled upon a Peshpeg settlement. There, he was welcomed, and he began to preach and he successfully converted many of the villagers to the Evangelical sect. He transcribed their language into a modified Latin script in order to translate the Bible to them. The script came to be known as the Evanjelastarin or Evanjelastarün, and soon this script was adopted by Peshpegs throughout Minhay, although the Širkattarnaft continued to be used in correspondence with the Minhast.

Evanjelastarin Characters
a á, e é, i í, o ó, ö (oe), u ú, ü (ue), b, p, f, v, d, t, g, k, c (ch), j, n, m, l, r, z, zh, s, sh, h, y

Consonants

Peshpeg Consonantal Inventory

	Bilabial	Alveolar	Palatal	Velar	Glottal	Laryngeal
Nasal	m	n
Plosive	p b	t d		k g	ʔ
Affricates			t͡ʃ d͡ʒ
Fricative	f v	s z	ʃ ʒ			h
Approximants			j
Flap		ɾ
Lateral		l

Vowels

	Front	Near- front	Central	Near- back	Back
Close	i u y ɪ o ɛ œ a
Near-close
Close-mid
Mid
Open-mid
Near-open
Open

Prosody

Stress

Nouns are generally stressed on the penult or antipenult syllable, but a number of them receive final-syllable stress. The romanized orthography marks final stress with an acute accent. Antepenultimate stress occurs if the syllable is closed, otherwise the word is pronounced on the penult syllable.

Morphology

Peshpeg was originally a nominative-accusative language. The language also had several noun classes that eventually collapsed into the present three-way declension system based on natural gender, animacy, and countability and concreteness. Today, the language has developed into a split ergative system, based on the animacy hierarchy of the noun class system. Nominative-accusative marking appears in first second pronominal forms, and Class I pronominal forms. These pronominal forms lie on the upper end of the animacy hierarchy, while all other forms are considered low animacy forms. Class II nouns were originally indeclinable and fell lower on the animacy scale, although they displayed some level of agency and thus took different affixes to denote their noun class. As Minhast expanded into Peshpeg-speaking lands, agent marking developed in these lower animacy nouns through the incorporation of the Minhast ergative marker =de, realized in Peshpeg Class II nouns as the submorpheme -d-. Agency for low animacy nouns is considered a marked condition, hence this explains the use of ergative morphology to indicate the marked condition. The unmarked form was reinterpreted as the absolutive case.

As for the Class III nouns, they remained unmarked for both case and number. This is unsurprising as these nouns are inherently uncountable, and statistically speaking, their role as agents is an uncommon, if not rare occurrence. The nominative-accusative marking of Class I nouns and the ergative marking of Class II nouns are sufficient to disambiguate the semantic role a Class III noun when it is a core argument. Ambiguity arises when two Class III nouns occupy both agent and patient roles in a transitive clause. In those cases, it is usually assumed that if one of the nouns was mentioned in discourse before the other, that noun functions as the agent. This indicates that in clause chains, Peshpeg employs an S/A pivot, in contrast to Minhast's S/O pivot.

Nouns

[stub]

Noun Classes

Peshpeg nouns fall into three declensions, or classes, simply called Class I, Class II, and Class III. The noun classes roughly coincide with natural gender and/or animacy.

• Class I nouns,

1. Preserve the original nominative-accusative system.
2. Typically are male humans, or consist of nouns that are associated with male attributes, particularly weapons. Divinities, supernatural events, wolves, horses, and moving bodies of water also fall within this class.

• Class II nouns

1. Morphosyntactically take ergative-absolutive pattern: they take the ergative -du/-dumu markers.
2. Follow along biological gender for female humans, and neuter animate count nouns, animals, except reptiles, amphibians, and fish. Some inanimate nouns are also found in this category, such as trees, household items e.g. tonkul "crockpot", or farming implements, e.g. vulpat "hoe".
3. These nouns are lower in the animacy hierarchy than the Class I nouns.

• Class III nouns

1. Occupy the lowest level in the animacy hierarchy
2. Take no marking for case or number.
3. Nouns falling in this class include certain body parts, non-mammalian/non-avian animals, most plants, mass nouns, inanimate objects, and abstract nouns.

Case and Number

Peshpeg displays a three-way split in its morphological alignment, reflecting the nominal system's animacy hierarchy. The nominal class system follows a nominative-accusative pattern among Class I nouns, an ergative-absolutive pattern in Class II nouns, and a direct alignment in its Class III nouns. The nominative-accusative pattern marks direct objects with the submorpheme -j-. The ergative-absolutive system is distinguished by the submorpheme -d- for ergative arguments. The direct alignment system has zero-marking on all core arguments, and makes no number distinction at all.

	Class I		Class II		Class III
	Sg	Pl	Sg	Pl	Sg	Pl
Ergative			-du	-dunu	-ri -rin, -rün *-in, -ün
Nominative-Absolutive	-∅	-mu	-∅	-na
Accusative	-jor	-jomu
Genitive/Dative/Benefactive	-jok	-jomok	-k -ak	-ndak	-rik -runk, -rünk
Allative	-jori	-jomori	-ri -ori	-ndori	-ri -rin, -rün
Ablative	-jolak	-jomolak	-lak	-ndolak	†-rlakin, -rlakün
Comitative/Instrumental	dorün + NOM.SG	dorün + NOM.PL	dorün + ABS.SG	dorün + ABS.PL	dorün + DIR.CASE

*The -in allomorph of the Class III suffix is favoured when the preceding phoneme is a palatalized consonant.
^†Not the expected -rinlak/-rünlak

In intransitive clauses, the nominative case of Class I nouns and absolutive case of Class II nouns, are indistinguishable:

Kodzorin iru daltashi.
'kod͡zoɾɪn ɪɾ'u dal'taʃi
kodzorin-∅ i-ru-∅ daltashi
hammer_PN.CL1.S-NOM PST-go-CL1.S alone
Kodzorin went unaccompanied.

Torzha irumvi daltashi.
torzha-∅ i-ru-mvi daltashi
girl.CL2.S.ABS PST-go-CL2.S alone
The girl went unaccompanied.

The split ergativity of the language can appear in the same clause. In the following example, torzha, a Class II noun, requires ergative marking to indicate it is serving as the agent, whilst the argument Kodzorin, a Class I noun, requires the accusative marker -jor to indicate its role as the patient of the sentence:

Torzhadu Kodzorinjor gumbiri jorlu.
torzha-du kodzorin-jor gumbiri jorlu.
girl.CL2.S-ERG hammer_PN.CL1.S-ACC AUX.CL2.S.PST hit
The girl struck Kodzorin.

Peshpeg is among the languages that use the conjunction "and" to express comitative and/or instrumental relations:

Kodzorin dorün Jadrom iru.
'kod͡ʒoɾɪn 'doɾyn 'd͡ʒadɾom ɪ'ɾu
kodzorin-∅ dorün jadrom-∅ i-ru-∅
hammer_PN.CL1.S-NOM and sword_PN.CL1.S-NOM PST-go-CL1.S
Kodzorin went with Jadrom.

The verb in the previous example employs Class I singular marking, iru-∅, which disambiguates the meaning and function of dorün, which here can only mean "with". Had the meaning "and" been intended, the verb would require plural marking, i.e. iru-ti, as in the following example:

Kodzorin dorün Jadrom Joryashri iruti.
'kodzoɾɪn 'doɾyn 'd͡ʒadɾom d͡ʒoɾ'jaʃɾi ɪɾ'uti
kodzorin-∅ dorün jadrom-∅ i-ru-ti
hammer_PN.CL1.S-NOM and sword_PN.CL1.S-NOM place_name.CL3-ALL PST-go-CL1.P
Kodzorin and Jadrom went to Joryash.

Plurality is marked on Class I and II nouns with a suffix beginning with nasal, -m- for Class I nouns, and -n- for Class II nouns, e.g:

Peshpegmu torzhana humbiri jorlu
pɛʃ'pɛgmu torʒ'ana 'humbiri d͡ʒoɾlu
peshpeg-mu torzha-na humbi-ri jorlu.
human.CL1-NOM.PL woman.CL2-ABS.PL AUX.CL1.P-PST hit
The men struck the women.

Number marking in Class III nouns is neutralized, e.g:

Tazhin abimon kor vendakrin dezhak gambi.
'taʒin 'abimon kor vɛn'dakrin 'deʒak 'gambi
tazh-rin abi=mon kor vendan-rin dezhak gambi
obedience-CL3 all=CONN virtue-CL3 supercede AUX.CLS3.PRS
Obedience outweighs all (other) virtues.

Golahátin irunki daltashi.
golahát-in i-ru-nki daltashi
in_duari-CL3 PST-go-CL3.S alone
The Ín Duári (man) went unaccompanied.

Irudak gajak gambi.
i-ru-dak gajak gambi
PST-go-INF foolish AUX.CL3.S.PRS
Going there was foolish (lit. "Having gone there is foolish.")

Postpositional Clitics

Case	Postposition
Dative-Allative	=āran =(a)ran
Benefactive	=nī =ni
Ablative	=yār =yar
Locative	=kī =ki
Inessive **	=kīr =kir
Instrumental	=pār =par
Comitative	=kān =kan
Malefactive	=daħ =dāħš =dāš
Vocative (Intimate)	=iyye =ē

Pronouns

Independent Pronouns

The independent pronouns show a consistent ergative-absolutive pattern, identifiable by the suffix -du attached to the absolutive form of the pronoun.

Verbs

Peshpeg verbs are divided into two classes, compound verbs, and synthetic verbs. Compound verbs consist of an inflected auxiliary followed by a verbal noun, although the verbal noun may precede the auxiliary. In contrast, synthetic verbs encode all verbal inflections on the verb root itself. Of these two classes, the compound verbs are the predominant class.

Compound Verbs

The auxiliary -mb- of compound verbs developed from the fusion of a bound pronominal marker to the connective particle mon (possibly derived from the Minhast connective min), which is attached to the suffix -bi¹, plus a tense-aspect marker. The verbal noun contains the semantic content of the verb phrase.

Orun mon golach on nodórji gomboji uzan.
/'oɾum mon 'golatʃon nod'oɾd͡ʒi 'gombod͡ʒi 'uzan/
orun=mon golach=mon nodor-ji gor-mon-bi-ji uzan
many CONN Ín_Duári CONN to.serve-NMLZ.AGT CL2-LOC-FUT riot
Many of the Ín Duári slaves will revolt.

If the verb is transitive, an object agreement clitic attaches to the beginning of the auxiliary, before the initial pronominal affix which occupies the subject position. In the example below, the object clitic gi= is obligatory, even if an overt object (e.g. tonkül "crockpot") is expressed:

Tonkül gisumbiri yilár.
/'toŋkyl gɪ'sumbɪɾi jɪ'la:ɾ/
tonkül gi=su-mon-bi-ri yilár
crockpot CL2.PL=1S-CONN-LOC-PST break
I broke the crockpots (lit. "Crockpot them-I-of-in-past breakage")

Norvadu tonkül gugombiri yilár.
/'norvadu 'toŋkyl gu'gombɪɾi jɪ'la:ɾ/
norva-du tonkül gi=gu-mon-bi-ri yilár
PN.CL2-ERG crockpot CL2.PL=CL2.S-CONN-LOC-PST break
Norva broke the crockpots (lit. "Crockpot them-she-of-in-past breakage")

Tovavat tonkül guyodombori yilár.
/'tovavat 'toŋkyl guyo'domboɾi jɪ'la:ɾ/
tovavat tonkül gi=yod-mon-bi-ri yilár
icicle.CL3 crockpot CL2.PL=CL3-CONN-LOC-PST break
Icicles broke the crockpots (lit. "Crockpot them-she-of-in-past breakage")

The pronominal affixes do not differ in form regardless of whether they occupy the subject or object positions. The auxiliary thus has full polypersonal marking and serve to disambiguate core arguments. Ambiguity arises in number marking in the Class II affixes in their pre-vocalic forms due to phonologic mergers. Class III affixes, like their independent forms, make no distinction in number.

The pronominal agreement markers appear in the following table:

Peshpeg Verb - Pronominal Agreement Affixes

	First Person		Second Person		Class I		Class II		Class III
	Sg	Pl	Sg	Pl	Sg	Pl	Sg	Pl	Sg	Pl
Before a consonant:	su-	ve-	mu-	jo-	ne-	hu-	gu-	gi-	ye- e- (precedes /j/, e.g. e-yódori)
Before a vowel:	s-	v-	m-	jor-	n-	h-	g-		y-

Present

Person	Number
	Singular	Plural
1	sumbi	vembi
2	membi	jombi
Class I	nembi	humbi
Class II	gumbi/gombi	gundombi/godombi
Class III	yódori yadombi

Past

Person	Number
	Singular	Plural
1	sumbiri	vembiri
2	membiri	jombiri
Class I	nembiri	humbiri
Class II	gumbiri gombiri	godombori
Class III	yódori yodombori

Future

Person	Number
	Singular	Plural
1	sumboji	vemboji
2	memboji	jomboji
Class I	nemboji	humboji
Class II	gomboji	godomboji
Class III	yodoroji ojori

Synthetic Verbs

Unlike compound verbs, which require two separate lexemes, an auxiliary verb plus a verb root, synthetic verbs encode all verbal inflections on the verb root itself. Synthetic verbs are conservative, preserving the original Peshpeg verbal paradigms.

Three tenses are distinguished: present (unmarked), past (marked with the prefix i-), and future (prefix ta-). Aspect marking is distinguished by null-marking for the perfect, and the prefix dal- for the imperfect. The prefixes show vowel harmony with the first vowel of the verb root.

The suffix -dak derives infinitives, used mainly to serve as the verb of a purposive clause. They inherit the tense and aspect of the verb of their matrix clause:

Kogan vordak Kodzorin iru.
/'kogan 'voɾdak 'kodzoɾɪn ɪ'ɾu/
kogan vori-dak kodzorin i-ru
deer.CL2.ABS hunt-INF hammer_CL1.NOM PST.CL1-go
Kodzorin went out to hunt deer (lit. "In order to hunt deer, Kodzorin went out")

Infinitives may also serve as verbal nouns, falling under Class III:

Irudak gajak gambi.
i-ru-dak gajak gambi
PST-go-CL3.INF foolish AUX.CL3.S.PRS
Going there was foolish (lit. "Having gone there is foolish.")

• vuz- to do, make; to cause

Present

Person	Number
	Singular	Plural
1	uzni	uzunti
2	uzi	uzusti
Class I	uzu	uzuti
Class II	uzumvi	uzumvit
Class III	uzunki urunkik

• ru- to go

Present

Person	Number
	Singular	Plural
1	runi	runti
2	ruzi	rusti
Class I	ru	ruti
Class II	rumvi	rumvit
Class III	runki runkik

Past

Person	Number
	Singular	Plural
1	iruni	irunti
2	iruzi	irusti
Class I	iru	iruti
Class II	irumvi	irumvit
Class III	irunki

Future

Person	Number
	Singular	Plural
1	turuni	turunti
2	turuzi	turusti
Class I	turu	turuti
Class II	turumvi	turumvit
Class III	turunki turunkik

• ye- to do

Present

Person	Number
	Singular	Plural
1	yeni	yenti
2	yezi	yesti
Class I	yi	yeti
Class II	yemvi	yemvit
Class III	yenki yenkik

Past

Person	Number
	Singular	Plural
1	iyeni	iyenti
2	iyezi	iyesti
Class I	iye	iyeti
Class II	iyemvi	iyemvit
Class III	iyenki iyenkik

Future

Person	Number
	Singular	Plural
1	tayeni	tayenti
2	tayezi	tayesti
Class I	taye	tayeti
Class II	tayemvi	tayemvit
Class III	tayenki tayenkik

• tor- to want

Present

Person	Number
	Singular	Plural
1	torni < tor-n-i	torunti < tor-n-t-i
2	torzi < tor-z-i	toristi < tor-z-t-i
Class I	tori < tor-i	torti < tor-t-i
Class II	torumvi < tor-mv-i	tormvit < tor-nv-i-t
Class III	torunki < tor-nk-i torunkik < tor-nk-i-t

Past

Person	Number
	Singular	Plural
1	itorni < i-tor-n-i	itorunti < i-tor-n-t-i
2	itorzi < i-tor-z-i	itoristi < i-tor-z-t-i
Class I	itori < i-tor-i	itorti < i-tor-t-i
Class II	itorumvi < i-tor-mv-i	itormvit < i-tor-nv-i-t
Class III	itorunki < i-tor-nk-i itorunkik < i-tor-nk-i-t

Future

Person	Number
	Singular	Plural
1	tatorni < ta-tor-n-i	tatorunti < ta-tor-n-t-i
2	tatorzi < ta-tor-z-i	tatoristi < ta-tor-z-t-i
Class I	tatori < ta-tor-i	tatorti < ta-tor-t-i
Class II	tatorumvi < ta-tor-mv-i	tatormvit < ta-tor-nv-i-t
Class III	tatorunki < ta-tor-nk-i tatorunkik < ta-tor-nk-i-t

• jóru- to say

Present

Person	Number
	Singular	Plural
1	jórni < jóru-n-i	jórunti < jóru-n-t-i
2	jorzi < jóru-z-i	joristi < jóru-z-t-i
Class I	jóri < jóru-i	jorti < jóru-t-i
Class II	jórumvi < jóru-mv-i	jórumvit < jóru-nv-i-t
Class III	jórunki < jóru-nk-i jórunkik < jóru-nk-i-t

Past

Person	Number
	Singular	Plural
1	ijórni < i-jóru-n-i	ijórunti < i-jóru-n-t-i
2	ijórzi < i-jóru-z-i	ijórusti < i-jóru-z-t-i
Class I	ijóri < i-jóru-i	ijórti < i-jóru-t-i
Class II	ijórumvi < i-jóru-mv-i	ijórumvit < i-jóru-nv-i-t
Class III	ijórunki < i-jóru-nk-i ijórunkik < i-jóru-nk-i-t

Future

Person	Number
	Singular	Plural
1	tajórni < tajóru-n-i	tajórunti < tajóru-n-t-i
2	tajórzi < tajóru-z-i	tajóristi < tajóru-z-t-i
Class I	tajóri < tajóru-i	tajórti < tajóru-t-i
Class II	tajórumvi < tajóru-mv-i	tajórumvit < tajóru-nv-i-t
Class III	tajórunki < tajóru-nk-i tajórunkik < tajóru-nk-i-t

Syntax

Constituent order

Old and Middle Peshpeg exhibited VSO order, but the modern language is now an SOV language due to Minhast influence.

Example texts

Dozun sujun guverin.
/dozyn sud͡ʒun gyvɛɾɪn/
doč=gun su-j-mon guve-rin
be.red.PST 1S-GEN-CONN face-CL3S
My face was red.

Footnotes

¹Possibly from a defunct locative case suffix -bi, ultimately derived from Middle Peshpeg *nimi "chest", c.f. Modern Peshpeg embi "hollow"