Eta-Talmic

The Talmic languages are a relatively isolated subbranch of the Quame language family. They are descended from Proto-Talmic (PTal).

Phylogeny

Noble Thensarian	Nurian Qelorian (Italian analogue) Bênôcian Arabic dialect-ish
T-Talmic languages	Andarin

Characteristics

The historical Talmic languages have all shared the following characteristics to some extent:

• conversion of a former case system into a system of state distinctions (e.g. definiteness, possessedness, predicative/attributive, generic/specific)
• rigidly head-initial word order
  • verb-initial clauses; modern Talmic languages are topic-prominent and thus have V2 independent clauses and verb-initial dependent clauses.
• heavy grammatical use of pronominal suffixes/enclitics on possessed nouns, verbs and prepositions, that index their dependents
  • some descendants eventually creep toward being polysynthetic, supplanting former finite verbs with possessed infinitives/participles of complex compound verbs, and predicative nouns
• differential indexing of the direct object and the possessor, and occasionally the prepositional object
• grammatical apophony (tonal, vocalic or consonantal)
• word order changes for topicalization and focusing
• More recent Talmic languages have honorific systems developed from abstract nouns in the feminine gender. Therefore former feminine pronouns and verbs develop into honorific markers.

Characteristic phylogenetic innovations vis-à-vis Zachydic include:

• prominence of tense rather than aspect in verbal TAM, unlike in mainland Zachydic languages.
• Rhotacization of /*z/ to /*r/ / V_V and V_#, and secondary rhotacization (often before consonants, the choice of which depends on the language).
• Development of Proto-Zachydic ejective stops into spirants.
• Conflation of non-labialized and labialized dorsal stops, and preservation of the velar-uvular distinction.
  • Also common is the transition of the uvular series into the radical series; uvulars are still found in some phonetically conservative languages and dialects, however.
• The shift of *s into *h and subsequent assibilation of affricates occuring after primary rhotacization (/*cʼ, *c/ > /*s/, /*ʒ/ > /*z/ etc.) greatly reduces the consonant inventory; this also contributes to the fricative-rich flavor of Talmic.
• Some metathesis occurred too.

Proto-Talmic phonology

• qʷ ɢʷ qʷ' > q ɢ q'
• p' t' c' ƛ' k' kʷ' q' qʷ' > f þ s ł x xʷ χ χ
• s > h
• c > s
• ƛ > t
• z > r / V_

Consonant inventory

Pyr Chilse model

The following is the Proto-Talmic consonant system as conjectured by Núrian Talmicist Dozīr pyr Chilse: he surmised that Proto-Quame ejective series had turned into an aspirated series in PTal, which has spirantized in daughter languages. This reconstruction is now considered obsolete.

Proto-Talmic reconstructed consonants (pyr Chlʰíse)
		Labial	Alveolar	Lateral	Palatal	Velar	Labiovelar	Uvular	Glottal
Nasal		*m	*n
Plosive	voiceless	*p	*t	*ƛ		*k	*kʷ	*q	*ʔ
	voiced	*b	*d	*λ		*g	*gʷ
	aspirated	*pʰ	*tʰ	*ƛʰ		*kʰ	*kʷʰ	*qʰ
Fricative	voiceless		*s	*ł					*h
	voiced		*z	*ḽ				*ʁ
Approximant				*l	*j		*w
Trill			*r

Guànitzhùtł model

Xamùz Guànitzhùtł revised the pyr Chlʰíse model, positing that the ejective-to-spirant shift had occurred earlier (probably ejective plosives ~ ejective affricates > affricates > fricatives); she noted the inconsistency of evidence for aspirated stops at any stage of Talmic languages.

Proto-Talmic reconstructed consonants (Guànitzhùtł)
		Labial	Alveolar	Lateral	Palatal	Velar	Labiovelar	Uvular	Glottal
Nasal		*m	*n
Plosive	voiceless	*p	*t			*k	*kʷ	*q	*ʔ
	voiced	*b	*d			*g	*gʷ
Fricative	voiceless	*φ	*s, *θ	*ł		*x	*xʷ	*χ	*h
	voiced		*z, *ð					*ʁ
Approximant				*l	*j		*w
Trill			*r

Vocalic inventory

	Front	Central	Back
Close	*i *ī		*u *ū
Mid	*e *ē		*o *ō
Open		*a *ā

Diphthongs:

• ai ei oi au eu ou
• āi ēi ōi āu ēu ōu

Proto-Talmic morphology

Nominal morphology

Nouns and adjectives had retained from Proto-Zachydic 6 cases (nominative, accusative, genitive/prepositional, allative, ablative, locative/instrumental), 3 numbers, 2 genders (masculine, feminine), and additionally possessive inflection for nouns. Like its daughter languages as well as Proto-Zachydic, Common Talmic is thought to have been a differential object marking language; only definite or specific direct objects were marked with the accusative case.

The essive case (*-ēri) was marginal, and was only used adverbially (cf. Th. -ēr adverbial suffix).

Some nouns took the "thematic" suffix/clitic *-ʔ with an uncertain meaning, a holdover from the classifier system in Proto-Zachydic.

Pronominal morphology

Proto-Talmic free pronouns can be reconstructed with less confidence because all case marking except as clitics and suffixes was eliminated.

Verbal morphology

Tense

The Proto-Talmic verbal system has converted the pre-existing aspect-based perfective/imperfective dichotomy into a time-based one (past/non-past). The irregularity of the past system is probably a result of conflation of many different parent aspect systems.

Aspect

The following aspect suffixes can be reconstructed:

• prospective *-eh-
• inceptive *-lʁa-
• cessative *-mbe-

Mood

Proto-Talmic has kept many moods intact (imperative, desiderative, hortative, optative). The negative imperative used the prohibitive particle along with the hortative form, as in Proto-Zachydic. The moods are frequently collapsed by its progeny (e.g. jussive in Themsaran).

Thematic suffixes

Proto-Talmic saw the development of thematic vowels from derivational suffixes. Thematic vowels are found in many Talmic languages, but modern languages often generalize the a-paradigm to the expense of the others.

• *-īn: basic verbs
• *-a-īn: denominative or transitive verbs
• *-e-īn: dynamic or reflexive verbs

TAM/subject affix paradigm

Todo: rederive past tense... they don't look like they could (all) be perfective suffixes.

Subject affixes
Present/Non-past
	Singular	Dual	Plural
1.ex	-īn	-dir	-mī
1.in	-	-ʁ-sē	-n-sē
2	-r	-r-sē	-l-sē
3.m	-m	-iri-	-ʁih
3.f	-isi		-tih
Simple past
	Singular	Dual	Plural
1.ex	-nʔe	-sid	-mā
1.in	-	-ʁʔā, -tar	-nʔā, -taq
2	-rʔe	-rʔā	-lʔā
3.m	-ā(-m)	-ā-iri	-ā-ʁih
3.f	-ā-isi		-ā-tih
Prospective
	Singular	Dual	Plural
1.ex	-eh-īn	-eh-dir	-eh-mī
1.in	-	-eh-ʁsē	-eh-nsē
2	-eh-r	-eh-rsē	-eh-lsē
3.m	-eh-m	-eh-iri-	-eh-ʁēj
3.f	-eh-isi		-eh-tēj
Imperative
	Singular	Dual	Plural
1.in	-	-ʁsi	-nsi
2	-h	-rsi	-lsi
Hortative
	Singular	Dual	Plural
1.ex	-īn-ti	-dis-ti	-mī-ti
1.in	-	-ʁs-ti	-ns-ti
2	-ti	-rs-ti	-ls-ti
3.m	-m-ti	-iri-ti	-ʁih-ti
3.f	-isi-ti		-tih-ti
Desiderative
	Singular	Dual	Plural
1.ex	-īn-ʔi	-dir-ʔi	-mī-ʔi
1.in	-	-ʁsē-ʔi	-nsē-ʔi
2	-r-ʔi	-rsē-ʔi	-lsē-ʔi
3.m	-m-ʔi	-iri-ʔ	-ʁih-ʔi
3.f	-isi-ʔi		-tih-ʔi
Optative
	Singular	Dual	Plural
1.ex	-īn-aʔ	-dir-aʔ	-mī-aʔ
1.in	-	-ʁs-aʔ	-ns-aʔ
2	-r-aʔ	-rs-aʔ	-ls-aʔ
3.m	-m-aʔ	-ir-aʔ	-ʁ-aʔ
3.f	-is-aʔ		-t-aʔ

Other verbal affixes

Other reconstructible affixes include:

• *-pe- potential (e.g. Thm. tacvéi 'know (a fact)' < tak-pe-īn 'be able to say')
• *-re- passive
• *-ina- causative, i.e. supply sb with sth to [verb]/a patient of [verb]
• *-ska- causative
• *az-, "towards" directional prefix.
• the memory evidential prefix *ʔṇʔ-.

Proto-Talmic syntax

Basic word order was most likely SVO, as evinced by the order verb-object suffix in all daughter languages.

Vocabulary

• *az- telic
  • Thm. ar-/as-
    • Núr. ar- superlative, intensive; s- telic