Azalic: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 142: Line 142:
Verb tenses were relatively complex, but the original PIE personal affixes were lost.
Verb tenses were relatively complex, but the original PIE personal affixes were lost.


when the subject is nominal singular, "he", "she" or "it", the "swe" is required for verbal agreement
When the subject was nominal singular, "he", "she" or "it", the suffix ''-se'' (from PIE *swe) was required for verbal agreement. The 2sg and 3sg distal pronouns are number neutral so they didn't take ''-se''.
 
the 2sg and 3sg distal pronouns are number neutral so they don't need *swe


The different forms were:
*Imperative (source of English imperative and subjunctive): non-past without any endings
*Imperative (source of English imperative and subjunctive): non-past without any endings
*Nonpast (the source of the English present): e-grade or otherwise the unmarked form of the verb
*Nonpast (the source of the English present): e-grade or otherwise the unmarked form of the verb