Vadi: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Phonology) |
|||
| Line 714: | Line 714: | ||
==Footnotes== | ==Footnotes== | ||
1) A major criticism directed towards Schumann, notably by Dr. Tashunka, is that although Schumann is "competent" in the ''Širkattarnaft'', he lacks a full understanding of its development and evolution, and how it was historically used by other non-Minhast minority speakers, namely the Peshpeg and Ín Duári, to transcribe their respective languages. | 1) A major criticism directed towards Schumann, notably by Dr. Tashunka, is that although Schumann is "competent" in the ''Širkattarnaft'', he lacks a full understanding of its development and evolution, and how it was historically used by other non-Minhast minority speakers, namely the Peshpeg and Ín Duári, to transcribe their respective languages.<br/> | ||
2) Schumann argues that gemination does not occur in Vadi, as the authors' ''Širkattarnaft'' does not show any gemination. This argument, as Tashunka notes, is problematic in that most Minhast writings, both past and present, rarely use the gemination diacritic. There is no reason to think the Vadi litigants would not follow the same practice. | |||
<!-- Template area --> | <!-- Template area --> | ||
[[Category:Vadi]] | [[Category:Vadi]] | ||
[[Category:Languages]] | [[Category:Languages]] | ||
[[Category:Conlangs]] | [[Category:Conlangs]] | ||