Linguifex:Honoured language: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "{{experimental}} {{header | file= Sun.png | filesize= 100 | title1 = Honoured languages | title2 = This page describes the concept of honoured languages by the Linguifex comm...")
 
 
Line 57: Line 57:


==[[File:Star 3.png|75px]] Completed language==
==[[File:Star 3.png|75px]] Completed language==
'''Completed languages''' achieve that which most conlangers dream about: Perfection, completion and use. Whilst no constructed language ever achieve perfection, it might be excellent in a plethora of aspects.
'''Completed languages''' achieve that which most conlangers dream about: perfection, completion and use. While no constructed language ever achieves absolute perfection, it might be excellent in many ways.


The language should excel in all of the above mentioned criteria, the article ought to be exhaustive and the texts and examples abundant. Nomination for honouring of a conlang works similarly to that of elected languages; however, when nominated, the language receives one week of voting, in which all users of the Conlang Wiki may vote. All users have one vote, but in these circumstances one may vote either '''for''' the language, or '''against''' it becoming dubbed "completed". All votes ought to be accompanied by a motivation, consisting of about one sentence.  
The language should excel in all of the criteria mentioned above, the article or articles ought to be exhaustive and the texts and examples abundant. Nomination for honouring of a conlang works similarly to that of elected languages. However, when nominated, the language receives one week of voting, in which all Linguifex users may vote. All users have one vote, but in these circumstances one may vote either '''for''' the language, or '''against''' it being labelled "completed". All votes ought to be accompanied by a motivation, summed up in a sentence or two.


When nominated for completion, the language must translate and gloss a fairly complex text, decided upon by the administration.  
When nominated for completion, the language must translate and gloss a fairly complex text, decided upon by the administration.  


When the voting has ended, the pro and con votes are counted and the language has the chance of being honoured with the badge of completion. Should the language fail to do this, the author may improve it and nominate it yet again.  
When the voting has ended, the for and against votes are counted and the language has the chance of being honoured with the badge of completion. Should the language fail to do this, the author may improve it and nominate it yet again.  
 


[[Category:Meta]]
[[Category:Meta]]
[[Category:Honoured]]
[[Category:Honoured]]