Vadi: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 461: / Line 461: @@
 ====Case====
-Six postpositional morphemes have been identified.  They were originally classified by Schumann as clitics, whereas Iyyaħmi has convincingly argued for their status as affixes, based on statistical frequencies of certain anomalies in the litigants' use of the Minhast orthography.  This article follows Iyyaħmi's classification, as this has now become the prevailing position of Vadists today.  Note that the case endings trigger mutations in any clitic or word that follows it:
+Six case morphemes have been identified.  They were originally classified by Schumann as postpositional clitics, whereas Iyyaħmi has convincingly argued for their status as affixes, based on statistical frequencies of certain anomalies in the litigants' use of the Minhast orthography.  This article follows Iyyaħmi's classification, as this has now become the prevailing position of Vadists today.  Note that the case endings trigger mutations in any clitic or word that follows it:
 {| class="bluetable lightbluebg"