Talk:A posteriori language: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
EmperorZelos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Well, thing is, this isn't a linguistics topic. It's just on conlangery. :p I thought that maybe since they are rather few, they could go without a prefix? looks better, as well. [[File:Waahlis.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Waahlis|<span style="color: Orange;">Waahlis</span>]]''' 07:43, 20 February 2013 (CET) | Well, thing is, this isn't a linguistics topic. It's just on conlangery. :p I thought that maybe since they are rather few, they could go without a prefix? looks better, as well. [[File:Waahlis.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Waahlis|<span style="color: Orange;">Waahlis</span>]]''' 07:43, 20 February 2013 (CET) | ||
I disagree, non-prefix is reserved for conlangs as they are the least marked thing here. it would be Guides I think [[File:Zelos.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User Talk:EmperorZelos|<span style="color:#800080;">Emperor Zelos</span>]]''' 18:49, 20 February 2013 (CET) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:49, 20 February 2013
Prefix
Shouldnt this have a prefix? 
Emperor Zelos 07:37, 20 February 2013 (CET)
Well, thing is, this isn't a linguistics topic. It's just on conlangery. :p I thought that maybe since they are rather few, they could go without a prefix? looks better, as well. 
Waahlis 07:43, 20 February 2013 (CET)
I disagree, non-prefix is reserved for conlangs as they are the least marked thing here. it would be Guides I think Emperor Zelos 18:49, 20 February 2013 (CET)