User talk:Chrysophylax: Difference between revisions

Line 468: Line 468:


Further arguments for my side: Waahlis' retroactive application of law is not condoned by neither the German Federal Constitution (Artikel 103, Teil 2), nor the Swedish Constitution (Kapitel 2, 10§), while the British legal structure does indeed allow such retroactive application of law but only by express will of the Parliament.<br/>Here it must be noted taht it isn't the individual punished but the act "repaired" to a state condoned by the current law while the previous state is in violation of said law except that it was condoned by the laws that applied at the time of creation of that state.<br/>23:48, 14 January 2013 (CET) [[User_talk:Herr Dunkel|'''<span style="color:black;">Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf</span>''']]
Further arguments for my side: Waahlis' retroactive application of law is not condoned by neither the German Federal Constitution (Artikel 103, Teil 2), nor the Swedish Constitution (Kapitel 2, 10§), while the British legal structure does indeed allow such retroactive application of law but only by express will of the Parliament.<br/>Here it must be noted taht it isn't the individual punished but the act "repaired" to a state condoned by the current law while the previous state is in violation of said law except that it was condoned by the laws that applied at the time of creation of that state.<br/>23:48, 14 January 2013 (CET) [[User_talk:Herr Dunkel|'''<span style="color:black;">Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf</span>''']]
You are correct in your assessment, although it is of little relevance to the operations of the website. I understand where you're coming from though.  [[File:Admin.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Chrysophylax|<span style="color: #3366BB ;">Chrysophylax</span>]]''' 22:21, 15 January 2013 (CET)


== Demonstration ==
== Demonstration ==