~~~ Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf 14:24, 12 January 2013 (CET)
This is the page if any of you blockees want to contact me to contact me on.
What's the meaning of this? 
Emperor Zelos 17:10, 12 January 2013 (CET)
If this is whom I think it is then the same as before applies. Emperor Zelos 17:12, 12 January 2013 (CET)
The meaning of that is, liberally, "he who must not be named", used primarily for Voldremort :)
Also, the chunk of text on my user page means "The Elector, Darkness Immaculate"
17:22, 12 January 2013 (CET) Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf
Let's just cut the crap, why are you here? Emperor Zelos 17:42, 12 January 2013 (CET)
Why shouldn't I be?
17:44, 12 January 2013 (CET) Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf
Don't act as if you do not know. You know everything you have done and repeated doing. Are you just here to troll? Emperor Zelos 17:47, 12 January 2013 (CET)
Yeah, I did do all the things I've done. I've done some you don't know about, yet I didn't do some others you think I did. But, looking impartially, I've done nothing absolutely wrong, not back home on Wikia, and most certainly not here.
Even if I were here to troll, I wouldn't admit it - who would? I'd do it even classier, but you all aren't worth it.
17:49, 12 January 2013 (CET) Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf
You sure are deluded if you think you have done nothing wrong. But if we are not worth it it still leaves the question, why are you here when you know you have several here whom greatly dislikes you and you can act out your power hunger desires on corruptia? Emperor Zelos 17:54, 12 January 2013 (CET)
First of all, tell me what I've done wrong here and what I've done wrong on Wikia?
I admit to manipulating you and Waahlis on Wikkii to get my position, but nothing on the two other hosts. Second, unless you've already noticed, I don't really care who dislikes me - I just keep on rolling my own way. Doesn't matter if it's one, two or several dozen. Aveneca and Incantena couldn't stop me, and I have many times more enemies there than here, so why should that stop me?
And, while you may call it hunger for power, I like to call it "ambition"
17:58, 12 January 2013 (CET) Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf
You would fit in 1940s Germany.
You have yet to answer my question, why are you here?
There is a differens between being ambitious and being power hungry, you are the later. Ambition requires several positive traits, none which you have. Emperor Zelos 18:00, 12 January 2013 (CET)
Welcome to Linguifex. I would add a welcome template, but it seems you have been introduced. If neither Zelos nor any one else would be kind not to bring any quarrels to this wiki, both I and the rest of the community would be delighted. This conversation is clearly degrading, and I'd advise both of you to cease with it. Sincerely, 
Waahlis 18:14, 12 January 2013 (CET)
Thank you, Waahlis. While certain people here seem to assume the worst of me, it's certainly not the opinion of certain other people.
Zelos, I fancy thinking I'd fit in the mid-thirties rather than the fourties; well, December '41 at the very latest is, I'd say, the edge of my optimal timeframe.
21:22, 12 January 2013 (CET) Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf
Welcome. My assumptions and opinions are irrelevant to the matter. This discussion is provocative and no continuation will follow, from either part. Waahlis 12:03, 13 January 2013 (CET)
Of course, I don't see a need either.
(and I wasn't talking about you)
13:04, 13 January 2013 (CET) Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf
Very well. Sincerely, Waahlis 23:07, 13 January 2013 (CET)
Warning
Waahlis may have already said it but I would like to reinforce the message once more.
This is an official warning from the Linguifex server administrator. There will be no further warring anywhere on this wiki. If you have a disagreement, then take it outside. This goes equally for all involved parties. ——— Gnomes. (talk) 16:13, 13 January 2013 (CET)
Even though I see no need to warn on my talk page, this is fair game.
Be kind not to do such things on my page any more, the orange thing that props up on "Recent changes" can be annoying.
16:19, 13 January 2013 (CET) Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf
The message was by no means directed to a certain part. And as a talk page, this page will continue to be used by both the administration, other users and you yourself. Sincerely, Waahlis 23:07, 13 January 2013 (CET)
Concerning the main part, that does not in any way relate to what I said: there is no need to warn other users, on my talk page.
And, as my talk page, it can get annoying to keep being notified about something that is, at its core, superfluous.
00:06, 14 January 2013 (CET) Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf
So was not apparent judging from your message, and now the point has been conveyed.
As a talk page, messaging will occur. It is unforunate that you find notifications on your talk page superfluous. I would also like to ask you not to blank this page, as now stated in the wiki general policy. You may archive it when new topics and discussions surpass 32 kilobytes. Waahlis 10:27, 14 January 2013 (CET)
So, you created a new policy just to prevent my blanking? That's just plain rude.
10:40, 14 January 2013 (CET) Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf
- The warning was placed on the page whereupon the discussion was taking place. I do not see any valid reason to complain over such a warning aimed at all the warring parties right next to the discussion.
Chrysophylax 21:39, 14 January 2013 (CET)
- Fair game. Check your talk page too.
22:05, 14 January 2013 (CET) Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf
- Fair game. Check your talk page too.
Regarding User:Gustavus-Adolphus
I would like to inquire about your relations with aforementioned user. Chrysophylax 21:37, 14 January 2013 (CET)
Dude I met on the scaly threads of furaffinity.
22:04, 14 January 2013 (CET) Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf
The other guy is, if you want to know, Wattmann. I believe your colleagues are aware of him already.
22:37, 14 January 2013 (CET) Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf
Thank you for your swift and clear response. It is much appreciated. Chrysophylax 23:24, 14 January 2013 (CET)
You're welcome.
23:40, 14 January 2013 (CET) Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf
Information
I hereby inform you of suspicion of violation of G:3 and B:2 in the Linguifex policy. The matter will be discussed and considered by the active administration, and conclude in a vote on the subject of eventual repercussions. If you have any objections, enquiries or desire further information, please state them below. Sincerely, the Linguifex administration and Waahlis 00:02, 15 January 2013 (CET)
Objections? I didn't do absolutely anything. Enquiries? Link me to these G:3 and B:2 since I can only find G:3.
00:07, 15 January 2013 (CET) Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf
Certainly; B:3 is found in the Linguifex:Deletion policy third section, second paragraph. G:3 is found in the very same policy, fourth section, third paragraph. Very well, your objections will be taken in consideration. Anything else? Sincerely, the Linguifex administration and Waahlis 16:46, 15 January 2013 (CET)
Addendum:
Due to your allegations of power and/or authority abuse directed at me, I will not be voting on the matter of your conviction or acquittance. Sincerely, Waahlis 16:46, 15 January 2013 (CET)
Anything else? First, make up your mind: B:2 or B:3? Second, A search for "B:" gives nothing.
Oh, and where might the esteemed Brit be?
17:10, 15 January 2013 (CET) Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf
Ah, you mean G. III - Pure Vandalism. If you check my contributions you shall see that I did no such thing.
17:24, 15 January 2013 (CET) Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf
Pardon me, I intended for it to say "B:2", as described. That is correct, you are suspected of sockpuppeting and vandalism. Sincerely, Waahlis 18:22, 15 January 2013 (CET)
Hm. I cannot be found guilty of either, but if you nest your charges (vandalism by way of sockpuppeting) you might appear to have more legitimacy in them.
18:50, 15 January 2013 (CET) Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf
So, any verdict? Any evidence whatsoever? I'm getting tired of waiting.
19:29, 20 January 2013 (CET) Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf
The discussions have not yet concluded in a verdict. I am sorry to keep you waiting, but it would seem it is difficult to come in contact with the others in the administration. We will reach a verdict as soon as possible. Waahlis 19:34, 20 January 2013 (CET)
RfA initiated 15/01/2013
A request for arbitration concerning you has been initiated at Linguifex:Arbitration/Requests/Case. Chrysophylax 23:17, 15 January 2013 (CET)
Results
First of all, I am sorry for the delay.
Secondly,
a minor investigation has been carried out to determine if you were complicit in the vandalism carried out by the perpetrators. Based on internal evidence, we have found it highly probable that you were. You claim to know the identities of the perpetrators SMPMons kai Gustavus-Adolphus, even before these had introduced themselves. We find it probable you were aware of not only the identities of the perpetrators but also of their intents. We speculate not on whether this was on your command or not; instead, the mere fact of knowing of the crime to be committed and not taking action to hinder it nor report the intentions of the vandals makes you complicit in their act.
Therefore, you are to be banned for twelve months from Linguifex.
Chrysophylax 00:54, 3 February 2013 (CET)
Some comments:
One: it is not hard to recognise them by those usernames seeing as they go about with them everywhere. SMPMons=Swampmonster, if you really want to prod, coming from "Watt - mann" = "Swampman"
Two: I want to see some evidence besides the "you know who they are and you're guilty" as that is an associative fallacy.
Three: how, really, do you expect me to prevent vandalism? It is not like I care if the place becomes vandalised, and I am not obliged to fix it. Are you going to also block Llyn for not stopping the acts of vandalism or are you going to go with that on just me?
12:33, 3 February 2013 (CET) Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf
Also, to actually complete this faux image of justice, you should actually ban me, not like let me do whatever I want.
12:46, 3 February 2013 (CET) Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf
User:Herr Dunkel has been blocked 1 year from editing the Linguifex wiki as per administrator discussion and verdict. Opportunity for appeal will occur every 6 months. Attempt of circumventing the block will result in a permanent blocking.
Administrator Chrysophylax is incorrect in his postulation of the administration whether the vandalising accounts acted on the command of the accused. It was considered most likely, thus partly explaining the violation of §B:2.
Regarding User:Llyn, we do not discuss other users, questions, eventualities or cases.
Sincerely, Waahlis 13:33, 3 February 2013 (CET)
Hola!
Hiya Rostov, wie geht's dir? Leider hab' ich deinen Kommentar entfernt weil ich den Diskussionsstrang von irrelevanten Beiträgen freihalten will. -- Χρυσοφύλαξ 07:52, 12 July 2014 (CEST)
Griaßdi! Ach, es geht. Kein Problem; nur ich wollt euch grüßn :]
Er Dessen Name Nicht Genannt Werden Darf 22:51, 12 July 2014 (CEST)