Carpathian verbs: Difference between revisions

From Linguifex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 94: Line 94:
|-
|-
|}
|}
Carpathian '''verbs''' reflect a complex system of morphology, more complicated than the nominals, with verbs categorized according to their conjugation class. Each finite verb is conjugated for person, number, tense, aspect, and mood, the last three usually being combined into a single category, called [[w:Tense–aspect–mood|TAM]]. In addition to finite verbs, non-finite forms such as [[w:Participle|participles]], [[w:Infinitive|infinitive]] and [[w:Supine|supine]] are also extensively used. Transitive verbs agree with two or more of its [[w:Argument (linguistics)|arguments]], which is called [[w:Polypersonal agreement|polypersonal agreement]], while intransitive verbs only agree with one argument — its subject. An extreme example of the agreement complexity can be seen in the following sentence: ''ei-ta-dōdah-ā-mi'' “He/she made me give it to them” ("to.them-that-made.give-he/she-me").
Most Carpathian verbs have three or four distinct basic stems, i.e. the stems of the imperfective, the aorist, the perfect and the infinitive. All forms of the verb were based on those stems: “sit” — ''sēdē-'' (infinitive and aorist), ''sēdi-'' (imperfective) and ''sōd-'' (perfect); “remain” — ''lik-'' (infinitive), ''leik-'' (present), ''likā-'' (aorist) ''laik-'' (perfect).


==Personal Endings==
==Personal Endings==

Revision as of 18:17, 24 February 2023

Carpathian verbs reflect a complex system of morphology, more complicated than the nominals, with verbs categorized according to their conjugation class. Each finite verb is conjugated for person, number, tense, aspect, and mood, the last three usually being combined into a single category, called TAM. In addition to finite verbs, non-finite forms such as participles, infinitive and supine are also extensively used. Transitive verbs agree with two or more of its arguments, which is called polypersonal agreement, while intransitive verbs only agree with one argument — its subject. An extreme example of the agreement complexity can be seen in the following sentence: ei-ta-dōdah-ā-mi “He/she made me give it to them” ("to.them-that-made.give-he/she-me").

Most Carpathian verbs have three or four distinct basic stems, i.e. the stems of the imperfective, the aorist, the perfect and the infinitive. All forms of the verb were based on those stems: “sit” — sēdē- (infinitive and aorist), sēdi- (imperfective) and sōd- (perfect); “remain” — lik- (infinitive), leik- (present), likā- (aorist) laik- (perfect).

Personal Endings

Carpathian has two different categories of verbs, based on their present tense personal endings: athematic and thematic, the latter category being much larger and still productive, consisting of every class of verbs but one. The subject endings of the two categories (for the M-type accent paradigm) are:

Carpathian verbs reflect a complex system of morphology, more complicated than the nominals, with verbs categorized according to their conjugation class. Each finite verb is conjugated for person, number, tense, aspect, and mood, the last three usually being combined into a single category, called TAM. In addition to finite verbs, non-finite forms such as participles, infinitive and supine are also extensively used. Transitive verbs agree with two or more of its arguments, which is called polypersonal agreement, while intransitive verbs only agree with one argument — its subject. An extreme example of the agreement complexity can be seen in the following sentence: ei-ta-dōdah-ā-mi “He/she made me give it to them” ("to.them-that-made.give-he/she-me"). Most Carpathian verbs have three or four distinct basic stems, i.e. the stems of the imperfective, the aorist, the perfect and the infinitive. All forms of the verb were based on those stems: “sit” — sēdē- (infinitive and aorist), sēdi- (imperfective) and sōd- (perfect); “remain” — lik- (infinitive), leik- (present), likā- (aorist) laik- (perfect).

Personal Endings

Carpathian has two different categories of verbs, based on their present tense personal endings: athematic and thematic, the latter category being much larger and still productive, consisting of every class of verbs but one. The subject endings of the two categories (for the M-type accent paradigm) are:

Athematic Thematic Athematic Thematic
Present Aorist Perfect
Singular 1st -mi -ùn -ùn -aĩ -ùn
2nd -si -ei -s -is -taĩ -is
Athematic Thematic Athematic Thematic
Present Aorist Perfect
Singular 1st -mi -ùn -ùn -aĩ -ùn
2nd -si -ei -s -is -taĩ -ùn

type accent paradigm) are:

Athematic Thematic Athematic Thematic
Present Aorist Perfect
Singular 1st -mi -ùn -ùn -aĩ -ùn
2nd -si -ei -s -is -taĩ -is

Personal Endings

Carpathian has two different categories of verbs, based on their present tense personal endings: athematic and thematic, the latter category being much larger and still productive, consisting of every class of verbs but one. The subject endings of the two categories (for the M-type accent paradigm) are:

Athematic Thematic Athematic Thematic
Present Aorist Perfect
Singular 1st -mi -ùn -ùn -aĩ -ùn
2nd -si -ei -s -is -aĩ -ùn
3rd -ti -e -èn -àn -èn -àn
Dual 1st -wḗ -(e)wā́ -awḗ -(a)wā́ -aiwḗ -(a)wā́
2nd -tā́ -(e)tā́ -atā́ -(a)tā́ -aitā́ -(a)tā́
3rd -tìs -(e)tìs -atìs -(a)tìs -aitìs -(e)tìs
Plural 1st -màs -(e)mà -amè -(a)mè -aimè -(e)mè
2nd -tè -(e)tè -atè -(a)tè -aitè -(a)tè
3rd -ènti -ànti -èn -àn -èn -àn

Conjugation

The following conjugations of verbs exist in the present tense: athematic, simple thematic ("e"-stem verbs) and suffix-thematic ("ī"-stem, "ē"-stem, and "ā"-stem verbs, as well as derived "jā"-stem, "au"-stem, "na"-stem among others). The future tense is formed using the si- suffix attached to the infinitive stem. The aorist tense has "ā"- and "ē"-stems. With a few exceptions, all verb endings were at some point of Carpathian history influenced by the ending of the present tense.