Chlouvānem: Difference between revisions

1,266 bytes added ,  18 April 2018
m
Line 618: Line 618:
: ''dašajildek līlta vīkṣṭāṭ no'' - “it rained, and the path collapsed”. Past tense: the path has since been repaired and it is walkable.  
: ''dašajildek līlta vīkṣṭāṭ no'' - “it rained, and the path collapsed”. Past tense: the path has since been repaired and it is walkable.  
: ''dašejilda līlta viṣustura no'' - “it has rained, and the path has collapsed”. Perfect “tense”: the path is not walkable due to it having collapsed.
: ''dašejilda līlta viṣustura no'' - “it has rained, and the path has collapsed”. Perfect “tense”: the path is not walkable due to it having collapsed.
An extension of this pattern is seen in that use where the past may imply, with some verbs, the cancellation of the original result through the opposite action, e.g.:
: ''hāliehulca prāgdeiru vuldate'' - "Hāliehulca (has) opened the window." Here, the perfect implies that the window is still open at the sentence's time (in this case, the present).
: ''hāliehulca prāgdeiru uldekte'' - "Hāliehulca opened the window." Here, the past implies that the window has since been closed.
A [[Chlouvānem/Calendar_and_time#Expressing_time_in_Chlouv.C4.81nem|"translative ''sām''"]] (i.e. "for a certain period of time") is typically present whenever the past form is used:
: ''hāliehulca prāgdeiru māmei railan sām uldekte'' - Hāliehulca opened the window for twelve ''railai'' = ''hāliehulca prāgdeiru vuldate : tū māmei railų nin spṛšekte/aspṛšate'' - "Hāliehulca opened the window, then closed it twelve ''railai'' later". Note that in the latter verb both the past and the perfect may be used freely; in colloquial style this is also possible for the first verb (e.g. ''hāliehulca prāgdeiru uldekte ...''), but this is considered a mistake in more formal contexts, c.f. the alternative translation "Hāliehulca, who had opened the window, ..."


Both the past and the perfect can be frequentative:
Both the past and the perfect can be frequentative:
8,510

edits