Talk:Bearlandic: Difference between revisions

From Linguifex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
Why is the language put in the "berilonic" language family instead of the Germanic one. I would get it if bearlandic didn't use germanic vocabulary, only grammar, but it uses both.
Why is the language put in the "berilonic" language family instead of the Germanic one. I would get it if bearlandic didn't use germanic vocabulary, only grammar, but it uses both.
[[User:Greatbuddha|Greatbuddha]] ([[User talk:Greatbuddha|talk]]) 21:44, 18 January 2014 (CET)
[[User:Greatbuddha|Greatbuddha]] ([[User talk:Greatbuddha|talk]]) 21:44, 18 January 2014 (CET)
:As Bearlandic is spoken on a conworld rather than on Earth, it should be put in a language family native to that conworld as well. [[User:Dē Graut Bʉr|Dē Graut Bʉr]] ([[User talk:Dē Graut Bʉr|talk]]) 22:08, 18 January 2014 (CET)

Revision as of 21:08, 18 January 2014

The sample looks nice! I can sort-of piece together the grammar through my knowledge of German, Icelandic, and Danish. Darthme (talk) 16:20, 18 April 2013 (CEST)Darthme

Thank you! The language is mostly based on Dutch, so with knowledge of Dutch or German, you should be able to understand some of it. --Dē Graut Bʉr (talk) 17:23, 18 April 2013 (CEST)

Why is the language put in the "berilonic" language family instead of the Germanic one. I would get it if bearlandic didn't use germanic vocabulary, only grammar, but it uses both. Greatbuddha (talk) 21:44, 18 January 2014 (CET)

As Bearlandic is spoken on a conworld rather than on Earth, it should be put in a language family native to that conworld as well. Dē Graut Bʉr (talk) 22:08, 18 January 2014 (CET)