User:Ceige/Kamunien: Difference between revisions

Made new wikimarkup tables for the cases rather than the incorrectly formatted ones from my plaintext notes
(Created page and put in classification nouns and verbs sections with content on inflectional endings and uralo-siberian connection)
 
(Made new wikimarkup tables for the cases rather than the incorrectly formatted ones from my plaintext notes)
Line 33: Line 33:
==== The Abstract Cases ====
==== The Abstract Cases ====
The old abstract cases are as follows:
The old abstract cases are as follows:
ABS -V    | -(i)k  | -(i)t    [Nom/Abs]
OBJ -(e)m  | -(i)kem | -(i)t(em) [Acc/Dat]
GEN -(e)n  | -(i)ken | -(i)ten  [Gen/Nom/Ben]
NOM -(e)p  | -(i)kep | -(i)tep  [Nom/Erg]


ABL -(e)ta | -(i)kka | -(i)tta   [Abl/Gen/Par/Ben]
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Case !! Singular !! Dual !! Plural !! Semantic Range
|-
| Absolutive || -V || -(i)k || -(i)t || [{{sc|nom/abs}}]
|-
| Objective || -(e)m || -(i)k(em) || -(i)t(em) || [{{sc|acc/dat/ben}}]
|-
| Genitive || -(e)n || -(i)ken || -(i)ten || [{{sc|gen/nom/ben}}]
|-
| Nominative || -(e)p || -(i)kep || -(i)tep || [{{sc|nom/erg}}]
|-
| Dialectal Nominative || -(e)pa || -(i)ppa/kka || -(i)ppa || [{{sc|nom/erg}}]
|-
| Ablative || -(e)ta || -(i)kka || -(i)tta || [{{sc|abl/par/gen/ben}}]
|}


The objective case is similar to the accusative, but differs when the usage of multiple nouns in different cases is considered. For example, use of the nominative and objective will mimic an Indo-European nom/acc usage, while absolutive and objective will also do the same, with the absolutive taking place of the nominative. This gets more complicated when all 3 are used - nominative takes the ergative role, absolutive takes the absolutive role, and objective takes the indirect object role.
The objective case is similar to the accusative, but differs when the usage of multiple nouns in different cases is considered. For example, use of the nominative and objective will mimic an Indo-European nom/acc usage, while absolutive and objective will also do the same, with the absolutive taking place of the nominative. This gets more complicated when all 3 are used - nominative takes the ergative role, absolutive takes the absolutive role, and objective takes the indirect object role.
Line 50: Line 61:
==== The Spacial Cases ====
==== The Spacial Cases ====
The new abstract cases are as follows:
The new abstract cases are as follows:
LOC -mi   | -ngi   | -ni
 
ABL -mit   | -ngit   | -nit
{| class="wikitable"
INE -min   | -ngin   | -nin
|-
ILL -minen | -nginen | -ninen
! Case !! Singular !! Dual !! Plural !! Usage
INS -mik   | -ngik   | -nik (-vik?)
|-
DAT -mu   | -ngu   | -nu
| Locative || -mi || -ngi || -ni || at
ALL -mut   | -ngut   | -nut
|-
EXE -mun   | -ngun   | -nun
| Ablative || -mit || -ngit || -nit || from
ELA -munen | -ngunen | -nunen
|-
PRO -muk   | -nguk   | -nuk (movement on something or by a way, e.g. through a house)
| Inessive || -min || -ngin || -nin || in
|-
| Illative || -minen || -nginen || -ninen || into
|-
| Instrumental || -mik || -ngik || -nik || by means of
|-
| Dative || -mu || -ngu || -nu || to, for, at
|-
| Allative || -mut || -ngut || -nut || to, towards
|-
| Exessive || -mun || -ngun || -nun || out, outside of
|-
| Elative || -munen || -ngunen || -nunen || outwards
|-
| Prosecutive || -muk || -nguk || -nuk || by way of
|}


(There are also emphatic versions of the final -t series, using -tsi instead, which can be used when -t is too hard to hear over a bare vowel)
(There are also emphatic versions of the final -t series, using -tsi instead, which can be used when -t is too hard to hear over a bare vowel)
870

edits