4,735
edits
User:Chrysophylax/Golden Afroasiatic: Difference between revisions
User:Chrysophylax/Golden Afroasiatic (view source)
Revision as of 01:26, 22 August 2015
, 22 August 2015→Morphosyntactic alignment
Chrysophylax (talk | contribs) m (→W-affixation) |
Chrysophylax (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
|} | |} | ||
While several branches, of which, most notably Semitic show postposed forms of these, the Berber and other families in the phylum show preposed forms. No order seems particularly deserving of primacy as far as I can see so I'll allow free variation in Golden Afroasiatic. | While several branches, of which, most notably Semitic show postposed forms of these, the Berber and other families in the phylum show preposed forms. No order seems particularly deserving of primacy as far as I can see so I'll allow free variation in Golden Afroasiatic. Note however that it could be argued that the preposed forms derive from originally deictic elements in Berber and possibly similar paths in other languages. Inflectionally, the case element appears to show up as a suffix more often than not (Egyptian, Semitic, Cushitic). | ||
===Noun phrase=== | ===Noun phrase=== | ||