924
edits
User talk:Darthme: Difference between revisions
→Re: Buerkáns
(→Re: Buerkáns: new section) |
|||
| Line 123: | Line 123: | ||
Hellu! ^^ Yes, regarding Buerkáns; I do think it looks rather plausible. That includes the phonology, the conjugation and the declensions. I like the linking and voicing processes in word boundaries! What I do find rather peculiar is the word "áppel", in which I would have expected the /p/ to have been voiced, historically. A tip is that you try to work out the sound shifts from Proto-Germanic a bit more. Or you could say it's a loan word! ^^ [[File:Waahlis.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Waahlis|<span style="color: Orange;">Waahlis</span>]]''' 19:06, 28 March 2014 (CET) | Hellu! ^^ Yes, regarding Buerkáns; I do think it looks rather plausible. That includes the phonology, the conjugation and the declensions. I like the linking and voicing processes in word boundaries! What I do find rather peculiar is the word "áppel", in which I would have expected the /p/ to have been voiced, historically. A tip is that you try to work out the sound shifts from Proto-Germanic a bit more. Or you could say it's a loan word! ^^ [[File:Waahlis.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Waahlis|<span style="color: Orange;">Waahlis</span>]]''' 19:06, 28 March 2014 (CET) | ||
Well now that you say it, áppel does make more sense with a voiced 'p'. I think it's just the native English influence in me :P Thanks for the critique :) [[User:Darthme|Darthme]] ([[User talk:Darthme|talk]]) 22:11, 8 April 2014 (CEST) | |||