Kämpya: Difference between revisions

2,492 bytes added ,  19 November 2013
Section on Intransitive Verbs finished
No edit summary
(Section on Intransitive Verbs finished)
Line 181: Line 181:
====With Pronouns====
====With Pronouns====


Kämpya only has a verb meaning "to be" if the subject is a pronoun. It is marked for 4 TAM categories (and is the only verb in the language to do so). These are Present Progressive (used for actions that are happening right now), Past Imperfect (also used for present habitual actions, or that are true in general), Perfect, and Future.
Kämpya only has a verb meaning "to be" if the subject is a pronoun. It is marked for 4 TAM categories (and is the only verb in the language to do so). It could thus be said that Kämpya has "tensed pronouns" (like Hausa). The 4 tenses are: Present Progressive (used for actions that are happening right now), Past Imperfect (also used for present habitual actions, or that are true in general), Perfect, and Future.


This verb is not marked for number, but takes different forms for 1st person subjects depending on whether the listener is included [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clusivity]. Another way of looking at this is that Kämpya makes no distinction between "us not including you" and "me".  
This verb is not marked for number, but takes different forms for 1st person subjects depending on whether the listener is included [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clusivity]. Another way of looking at this is that Kämpya makes no distinction between "us not including you" and "me".  
Line 242: Line 242:


In other cases where English would use the word "to be", Kämpya does not use a copula [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_copula] and simply places the two words together e.g.
In other cases where English would use the word "to be", Kämpya does not use a copula [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_copula] and simply places the two words together e.g.
/ˈsíʔtà ˈḛ̂nèmì/
guardian enemy
The guardian is / was / will be the enemy.
===Intransitive Sentences===
Intransitive sentences generally have free word order. If the verb is in focus [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focus_(linguistics)], then it will come after the subject. If the subject is in focus, then it will come after the verb. So both of the following are grammatical:c
/ˈḛ̂nèmì áˈlôṵn/
enemy alone
The enemy is / was / will be '''alone'''.
as well as
/áˈlôṵn ˈḛ̂nèmì/
alone enemy
The '''enemy''' is / was / will be alone.
Note that intransitive sentences are not marked for TAM.
====With Postpositional Phrases====
Likewise, if we include a postpositional phrase in the sentence, word order is fairly free e.g. with the postpositional phrase /ˈkʰóʔnàt m̥à/ - "from ˈkʰóʔnàt (a place name)", the verb /kúʔn/ - "to set off" and the noun /ˈḛ̂nèmì/ - "enemy", we can say:
/ˈkʰóʔnàt m̥à ˈḛ̂nèmì kúʔn/
/ˈkʰóʔnàt m̥à kúʔn ˈḛ̂nèmì/
/ˈḛ̂nèmì kúʔn ˈkʰóʔnàt m̥à/
/ˈḛ̂nèmì ˈkʰóʔnàt m̥à kúʔ/
/kúʔn ˈḛ̂nèmì ˈkʰóʔnàt m̥à/
These all mean "The enemy set off / sets off / will set off from ˈkʰóʔnàt". However sentences like */kúʔ ˈkʰóʔnàt m̥à ˈḛ̂nèmì/ are ungrammatical i.e. Kämpya does not permit the word order Intransitive Verb - Postpositional Phrase - Subject.
====With Pronouns====
The same tensed pronouns as before are also used for intransitive sentences e.g.
/jó kúʔn/
2PS.PROG depart
You are setting off.
Note that here TAM is marked (on the pronoun). So we can just as easily say:
/jú kúʔn/
2PS.FUT depart
You will set off
And we can use the emphatic forms of the pronouns to say things like:
/jò̰ kúʔn/
2PS.PROG.EMP depart
'''You''' will set off.
However, the pronoun must immediately precede the verb so */kúʔn jó/ is ungrammatical. And postpositional phrases cannot intervene between the pronoun and the verb, so */jó ˈkʰóʔnàt m̥à kúʔn/ is ungrammatical (unlike sentences such as /ˈḛ̂nèmì ˈkʰóʔnàt m̥à kúʔn/ which are grammatical). It is only grammatical to say:
/ˈkʰóʔnàt m̥à jó kúʔn/
ˈkʰóʔnàt from 2PS.PROG depart
You are setting off from ˈkʰóʔnàt.
or
/jó kúʔn ˈkʰóʔnàt m̥à/
2PS.PROG depart ˈkʰóʔnàt from
You are departing from ˈkʰóʔnàt.