Kämpya: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,948 bytes added ,  22 November 2013
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 107: Line 107:
/h/ never occurs after vowels with harsh phonation.
/h/ never occurs after vowels with harsh phonation.


Of course, if a process such a cliticisation (e.g. with the genitive clitic /jà/ or the benefactive clitic /àuŋ/), means that the /h/ is no longer in coda position, then these process do not occur e.g.
Of course, if a process such a cliticisation (e.g. with the genitive clitic /jà/ or the dative clitic /àuŋ/), means that the /h/ is no longer in coda position, then these process do not occur e.g.


/à̤h jà/ - "of the question (alienable)" is pronounced [ˈà̤çà] (/hj/ assimilates to [ç]).
/à̤h jà/ - "of the question (alienable)" is pronounced [ˈà̤çà] (/hj/ assimilates to [ç]).
Line 113: Line 113:
/dáʔh jà/ - "of the darkness (alienable)" is pronounced [ˈdáʔçà].
/dáʔh jà/ - "of the darkness (alienable)" is pronounced [ˈdáʔçà].


/à̤h àuŋ/ - "for the question" is pronounced [ˈà̤ɦàuⁿ].
/à̤h àuŋ/ - "to the question" is pronounced [ˈà̤ɦàuⁿ].


/dáʔh àuŋ/ - "for the darkness" is pronounced [ˈdáʔhàuⁿ].
/dáʔh àuŋ/ - "to the darkness" is pronounced [ˈdáʔhàuⁿ].




Line 231: Line 231:
===Possessive Pronouns===
===Possessive Pronouns===


These inflect for alienable vs. inalienable possession, however, in the emphatic form, these are not distinguished:
These inflect for alienable vs. inalienable possession, however, in the emphatic form, these are not distinguished. There is also a proximate vs. obviative distinction on 3rd person possessive pronouns. The proximate pronouns are used when the possessor was the last noun that was in the absolutive case (i.e. unmarked). The obviative pronouns are used in other cases.
 


{| class="wikitable"
|-
! !! 1st Person Exclusive !! 1st Person Inclusive !! 2nd Person !! 3PS Proximate !! 3PS Obviative
|-
| Before a consonant (Inalienable) || mái || áu || jó || dé || ðí
|-
| Before a vowel (Inalienable) || máj- || áw- || józw- || dézw- || ðj-
|-
| Alienable || môṵ || ˈḛ̂wà || jô̰ || dḛ̂- || ðjíʔ
|-
| Emphatic || mòṵ || ˈḛ̀wá || bwò̤ || swḭ̀ || sḛ̀
|}




Line 365: Line 376:
However, immediately after an open syllable with a stressed vowel, the ergative clitic has the allomorph /-ɾu/ e.g.
However, immediately after an open syllable with a stressed vowel, the ergative clitic has the allomorph /-ɾu/ e.g.


/ŋà̤=ɾu káiʔk gáʔɾ/
/ŋà̤=ɾù káiʔk gáʔɾ/


fish=ERG bite lizard
fish=ERG bite lizard
Line 415: Line 426:




However, the subject pronoun still come immediately before the verb, so sentences like */gáʔɾ káiʔk/ are ungrammatical.
However, the subject pronoun still come immediately before the verb, so sentences like */jéi gáʔɾ káiʔk/ are ungrammatical.




Line 439: Line 450:
When both the subject and the object of a verb are pronouns, the subject comes first e.g.
When both the subject and the object of a verb are pronouns, the subject comes first e.g.


=swí=káiʔk
jéi=swí=káiʔk


2PS.PROG.NOM=3PS.ACC=bite
2PS.NOM=3PS.ACC=bite
 
You are biting him.




Line 493: Line 506:


The dog abandoned (someone / something).
The dog abandoned (someone / something).
The deleted object can be re-introduced into the sentence using the dative clitic /-àuŋ/ e.g.
/kʰwèi̤ θú=káiʔk gáʔɾ=àuŋ/
dog ANTPASS=bite lizard=DAT
The dog bit the lizard.
At first glance, this may seem pointless, as we could have quite easily have said:
/ˈkʰwèi̤=zù káiʔk gáʔɾ/
dog=ERG bite lizard
It was the dog that bit the lizard.
However, the difference is that Kämpya has ergative syntax. Whatever argument of the verb is in the absolutive case is the syntactic pivot [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntactic_pivot]. In a normal transitive sentence, this is the object of the verb. But, by using the antipassive voice, the subject of the transitive verb becomes the syntactic pivot. If we combine the two sentences above with the verb /pjèi̤/ - "to flee", the meaning becomes very different:
/kʰwèi̤ θú=káiʔk gáʔɾ=àuŋ pjèi̤/
dog ANTPASS=bite lizard=DAT flee
The dog bit the lizard and (the dog) ran away.
vs.
/ˈkʰwèi̤=zù káiʔk gáʔɾ pjèi̤/
dog=ERG bite lizard flee
The dog that bit the lizard and the lizard ran away.
Note that the dative clitic has the allomorph /jàuŋ/ after a vowel e.g.
/gáʔɾ θú=káiʔk kʰwèi̤=jàuŋ/
lizard ANTPASS=bite dog=DAT
The lizard bit the dog.

Navigation menu