Valthungian: Difference between revisions

1,525 bytes added ,  29 March 2019
Line 1,403: Line 1,403:


===Anomalous Verbs===
===Anomalous Verbs===
''Dōn'' is sometimes categorized as a Class VII strong verb, though it does not follow the same reduplication or ablaut patterns of other verbs in this class. Some Germanic philologists also argue that the ancestor of Proto-Germanic ''dōną'' actually gave rise to the /d/-reduplication in the past tense of weak and preterit-present verbs.
{{Template:Valthungian/v.st.7dōn}}
{{Template:Valthungian/v.st.7dōn}}
''The present indicative tense of ''gǣn/gangna'' has two forms – a short and a long form – as did the non-finite forms (the infinitive and the participles) as well as most of the imperatives. The past tenses show suppletion, and have been replaced by ''īǧ-'' from Proto-Germanic *''ijj-'', the same source as Old English ''ēode'', and ultimately related to the Latin verb ''ire''.


{{Template:Valthungian/v.st.7gang}}
{{Template:Valthungian/v.st.7gang}}
''The present indicative tense of ''stǣn/standna'' has two forms – a short and a long form – as did the non-finite forms (the infinitive and the participles) as well as most of the imperatives. Though it acts like a Class VI verb in how it ablauts in the past, there is also a parallel form with reduplication, indicating Class VII.


{{Template:Valthungian/v.st.6stand}}
{{Template:Valthungian/v.st.6stand}}
''Wisna'' is easily the most heavily suppleted of the Germanic verbs. Aside from the obvious ''wis-'' stem, which is completely missing from the present tenses, the present shows two other stems, ''i-'' and ''sī''. The imperative also has an anomalous ''ī'' as an alternative for the second person singular, though it is unrelated to the ''i-'' stem of the present, and may actually come from Latin ''ī'', imperative form of ''ire'' (‘to go’).


{{Template:Valthungian/v.st.5wis}}
{{Template:Valthungian/v.st.5wis}}