User:IlL/A Danified analytic Neo-Arabic/Ancient: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 33: Line 33:
The definite article was ''ʔaC-'' (from Biblical Hebrew ''*haC-''). It caused gemination of the following consonant; if the following consonant was a guttural and thus could not geminate, it was lengthened to ''ʔā-''.
The definite article was ''ʔaC-'' (from Biblical Hebrew ''*haC-''). It caused gemination of the following consonant; if the following consonant was a guttural and thus could not geminate, it was lengthened to ''ʔā-''.


The Biblical feminine singular ending ''*-ā́'' became unstressed ''-a'' (e.g. ''ʔašíra'' 'sacred tree'), and the stress in feminine singular nouns in ''-a'' shifted to penultimate (by analogy with masculine singular adjectives and 3fs perfect verbs). The feminine plural ending was unstressed ''-oδ'' (e.g. ''ʔašíroδ'' 'sacred trees'), from Biblical Hebrew ''*-ōt''.
The Biblical feminine singular ending ''*-ā́'' became unstressed ''-a'' (e.g. ''ʔašḗra'' 'sacred tree'), and the stress in feminine singular nouns in ''-a'' shifted to penultimate (by analogy with masculine singular adjectives and 3fs perfect verbs). The feminine plural ending was unstressed ''-oδ'' (e.g. ''ʔašḗroδ'' 'sacred trees'), from Biblical Hebrew ''*-ōt''.


The construct state was not as "hard" as Tiberian Hebrew.
The construct state was not as "hard" as Tiberian Hebrew.
139,285

edits

Navigation menu