Scellan/Syntax: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 165: Line 165:
*resumptive pronouns are optional - hence relative clauses can end in a preposition as in English
*resumptive pronouns are optional - hence relative clauses can end in a preposition as in English
**This state of affairs came about because the older resumptive pronominal affixes on prepositions elided and the emphatic pronoun remained optional.
**This state of affairs came about because the older resumptive pronominal affixes on prepositions elided and the emphatic pronoun remained optional.
**the resumptive pronoun may replace the relativizer, as in Modern Hebrew
*for places, ''cah'' 'there' can be used as a resumptive pronoun
*for places, ''cah'' 'there' can be used as a resumptive pronoun
*in formal writing, to eliminate ambiguity ''mes'' 'this' may be used as a resumptive pronoun or the head noun may be repeated.
*in formal writing, to eliminate ambiguity ''mes'' 'this' may be used as a resumptive pronoun or the head noun may be repeated.
Line 171: Line 172:
:what confirm COMP equal SPEC.PL two as desire
:what confirm COMP equal SPEC.PL two as desire
:''...which confirms that the two are equal, as desired.''
:''...which confirms that the two are equal, as desired.''
*Non-restrictive relative clauses are indicated by simple apposition.
*Non-restrictive relative clauses are indicated by simple apposition


===Complement clauses===
===Complement clauses===
139,285

edits

Navigation menu