140,359
edits
m (→Practices) |
m (→Second Mover) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
''Nutłaχ Hiraθ'' /nuˈtʂakʰ hiˈratʰ/, [[Clofabosin]]: ''ribilzavudan'') is a central [[Talma|Talman]] spiritual concept representing creativity, agency and moral good within humans. In Mărotłism the doctrine states that we humans are responsible for "creation" and formulating rules, where "God has left off", even when no one is telling us what to do. | ''Nutłaχ Hiraθ'' /nuˈtʂakʰ hiˈratʰ/, [[Clofabosin]]: ''ribilzavudan'') is a central [[Talma|Talman]] spiritual concept representing creativity, agency and moral good within humans. In Mărotłism the doctrine states that we humans are responsible for "creation" and formulating rules, where "God has left off", even when no one is telling us what to do. | ||
The Second Mover is the force (described | The Second Mover is the force (described sometimes as ''hălpăθin, te łălisφow, te bintănse'' "reason, empathy and action") that guides us to the ideal of truth, good, and beauty. | ||
According to Snielism, or Mărotłite mysticism, it is entirely separate from any god. The Second Mover is often called '''the Nameless''' (''φid mo tsip χum''), the idea being that following the Second Mover should not be about pursuing a name or following a predetermined procedure. Mărotłites would at best balk at "naming the Nameless" (Windermere: ''chithum fid mo tsip chum''), i.e. identifying the Second Mover with a specific god or human, like [[Verse:Tricin/Ngronaism|Ngronaism]] does. | |||
There is a set of religious statutes (CWdm: ''hooyma'', sg. ''hăyma'') partially determined by the Foranloíd, and partially determined by the Pĭdas' writings. As such there is very much a concept of sin (''φrăcing''). | There is a set of religious statutes (CWdm: ''hooyma'', sg. ''hăyma'') partially determined by the Foranloíd, and partially determined by the Pĭdas' writings. As such there is very much a concept of sin (''φrăcing''). |
edits