Roshterian: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 43: Line 43:
(In modern Roshterian orthography: ''Bys oṟbiroxṯerimytaicyn, boorimitupyryn.'' 'gladly-language-Roshterian-speak-1SG but-EVID.DIR-NEG-do-can-1SG')
(In modern Roshterian orthography: ''Bys oṟbiroxṯerimytaicyn, boorimitupyryn.'' 'gladly-language-Roshterian-speak-1SG but-EVID.DIR-NEG-do-can-1SG')


This sentence was likely written by a non-native speaker of Roshterian, seeing by the fact that he/she omitted evidentials, which would be required in the second clause.
This sentence was likely written by a non-native speaker of Roshterian, seeing by the fact that they omitted evidentials, which would be required in the second clause.


The significance of Roshterian for Talmic linguistics was first noted by the Skellan linguist Aloð Bolltind. He proposed that it reflected all four dorsal series of Proto-Talmic differently, unlike the Thensaric languages hitherto known in Talma:  
The significance of Roshterian for Talmic linguistics was first noted by the Skellan linguist Aloð Bolltind. He proposed that it reflected all four dorsal series of Proto-Talmic differently, unlike the Thensaric languages hitherto known in Talma:  
143,244

edits

Navigation menu