Aarlaansc: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
963 bytes added ,  19 November 2012
mNo edit summary
Line 871: Line 871:
The irregularities are not systematic: how it can be seen, both ''vaar'' and ''daar'' have got an infinitive in ''-aar'', but the former has got a root form ''vach-'' in the three singular persons, whereas the latter has got a root form ''doe-''. More systematic (but not ever) are the verbs whose infinitive ends in ''-Ver'': in the three singular persons the root form ends in ''-Vf'', ex.: ''id pluft'', "it rains", from ''pluer'', ''eg me laf'', "I wash (myself)", from ''laer-ze'', and so on.
The irregularities are not systematic: how it can be seen, both ''vaar'' and ''daar'' have got an infinitive in ''-aar'', but the former has got a root form ''vach-'' in the three singular persons, whereas the latter has got a root form ''doe-''. More systematic (but not ever) are the verbs whose infinitive ends in ''-Ver'': in the three singular persons the root form ends in ''-Vf'', ex.: ''id pluft'', "it rains", from ''pluer'', ''eg me laf'', "I wash (myself)", from ''laer-ze'', and so on.
However it is best to control in the dictionary how the root form of the irregular verbs changes.
However it is best to control in the dictionary how the root form of the irregular verbs changes.
===Impersonal form===
To express actions that are performed by an unknown subject or to hide the subject of a verb in Aarlaansk we can use the '''impersonal form'''.
In Aarlaansk there are two impersonal pronouns:
* ''id'', which mainly corresponds to English "that", is used also to translate "it" when we talk about verbs that haven't got a subject, as in the example ''id pluft'', "it rains";
* '''em''', which is used in the impersonal form and substitutes a subject that we don't know or that we don't want to express; it mainly corresponds to English "they" or to passive construction.
The biggest difference between ''id'' and ''em'' is that '''id can never substitute a subject that actually exists and can never substitute the passive form''', whereas ''em'' can, ex.:
* ''Hod id nift'' - Today it snows;
* ''Em dijkt ke Hies Aarlaans zunt vrijcht'' - They say that the Aarlaans are cold.
With ''em'' it is used the 3rd person singular verb form.


===Simple past===
===Simple past===
886

edits

Navigation menu