Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Line 1,502: |
Line 1,502: |
| ===UDHR=== | | ===UDHR=== |
| {{Gael|Ꞃaudì-sê wꞅescai lidea waulnê i sobie aꞃwnê wu saì dôstauinausti a saìm pꞃàwum. Lesun ꞅi nadàꞃenê ꞅe aꞃzumu i pꞃawoznaùnì, tedai les dolg nanim ċiniṫ aden wuzglaindem teo dꞃugoeo wu duchu teo bꞃatꞃstwa.}} | | {{Gael|Ꞃaudì-sê wꞅescai lidea waulnê i sobie aꞃwnê wu saì dôstauinausti a saìm pꞃàwum. Lesun ꞅi nadàꞃenê ꞅe aꞃzumu i pꞃawoznaùnì, tedai les dolg nanim ċiniṫ aden wuzglaindem teo dꞃugoeo wu duchu teo bꞃatꞃstwa.}} |
|
| |
| ==Early Modern Albionian==
| |
| Today some syntactic constructions and endings from Early Modern Netažin still survive in poetic or flowery Netažin, but the register as a whole sounds markedly religious and is thus not used even in modern fantasy or historical fiction.
| |
| ===Accent===
| |
| *Old acute (modern stød): ạ
| |
| *Neoacute (high rising): á
| |
| *Dipping-rising: à (resulting from contraction of VjV)
| |
| *Grave or circumflex (low): à (long but not acute)
| |
| *Unaccented: a (resulting from stress shift to initial)
| |
|
| |
| All of those diacritics (except the flat one for length) are obsolete today, except the old acute in dictionaries; neoacute, old acute dipping rising and grave all merged into length marked with the question-mark diacritic. Only old editions of religious and liturgical texts consistently use tone diacritics.
| |
|
| |
| ===Morphology===
| |
| *Instrumental case (''instrumentaùl'')
| |
| *Pseudo-dual dative and instrumental endings in {{Gael|-ma}}: {{Gael|walsnaìma dweama aucima}} 'with one's own two eyes'
| |
| *Some archaic forms such as {{Gael|ꞃeacl}} 'he said' for {{Gael|ꞃeal}}
| |
| *Possessive adjectives in ''-ow'' or ''-in'' more widespread (''ty marchogowea Arþyrowai'' 'Arthur's knights', modern ''ty marchogowea Arthyra'')
| |
| *Infinitives in ''-ti'' or ''-thi'' (e.g. ''dealati'', ''rieþi'')
| |
| *Pro-drop when the subject is not 3rd person
| |
| *3sg, 2pl and 3pl present and future perfective forms in ''-t'', ''-te'' and ''-nt'' (e.g. ''dealàt, dealàte, dealànt'', sometimes for more archaic effect ''dealaït, dealaïte, dealaïnt''); the 3pl form is always used with a plural subject.
| |
| *''ne'' used without ''als''.
| |
| *''est'' and ''sunt'' are used for 3sg and 3pl present of ''baịt'' (The modern forms ''les/os'' and ''len/lesun/òn/osun'' are from ''gleḋ/ot est'' 'here is' and ''gleḋ/ot sunt''.)
| |
| *definite articles in genitive phrases: a genitive phrase of the form X DEF.GEN Y.GEN is implied to be definite (cf. Hebrew and Irish). On the other hand, Modern Albionian usually requires X to take the definite article as well.
| |
| *The use of ''-li'' on verbs for interrogatives: ''znạꞅ-li?'' 'dost thou know? kennst du?' This still survives as a way to mark conditional clauses in modern formal language.
| |
| *''-mo'' is sometimes used instead of ''-m'' for dative (but not instrumental) singular masculine and neuter adjectives and pronouns: ''spiewejte jemo pieseň nowa'' 'sing unto him a new song', ''prechodnejmo'' 'fleeting'. ''-mo'' is still found in literary poetry but it doesn't consistently correspond to the Proto-Slavic dative. <!-- I chose to change mu to mo to make it sound like Archaic Biblical Hebrew -ėmo -->
| |
| *Adjectives may come before nouns.
| |
| *Early Modern Albionian disallowed morphological "double negatives":
| |
| **ne... aden X instead of ne... wals ġàdnoeo X
| |
| **ne... weath instead of ne... wals niċeo
| |
| **ne... ċelweac 'not a human' instead of ne... wals niceo
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|