171
edits
Czecklish conjugation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Evidentiality
Mcmisher96 (talk | contribs) |
Mcmisher96 (talk | contribs) m (→Evidentiality) |
||
| Line 434: | Line 434: | ||
==Evidentiality== | ==Evidentiality== | ||
In Czecklish, Evidentiality is the indication of the nature of evidence for a given statement; that is, whether evidence exists for the statement and/or what kind of evidence exists. An evidential is the particular grammatical element (affix, clitic, or particle) that indicates evidentiality. Czecklish uses suffixes to indicate both Direct and Indirect Evidentiality. Indirect Evidentiality can be divided into four separate degrees of Evidentiality: First Reportative, Second Reportative, Inferential, and Assumed. The unmarked Evidential is the Direct Evidential, as most evidence is likely to have been witnessed firsthand.<br /> | In Czecklish, Evidentiality is the indication of the nature of evidence for a given statement; that is, whether evidence exists for the statement and/or what kind of evidence exists. An evidential is the particular grammatical element (affix, clitic, or particle) that indicates evidentiality. Czecklish uses suffixes to indicate both Direct and Indirect Evidentiality. Indirect Evidentiality can be divided into four separate degrees of Evidentiality: First Reportative, Second Reportative, Inferential, and Assumed. The unmarked Evidential is the Direct Evidential, as most evidence is likely to have been witnessed firsthand.<br /> | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" class="bluetable lightbluebg" style="width: | {| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" class="bluetable lightbluebg" style="width: 300px; text-align:center;" | ||
! style="width: 40px; "| | ! style="width: 40px; "| | ||
! style="width: 40px; " |Suffix | ! style="width: 40px; " |Suffix | ||