User:IlL/A Danified analytic Neo-Arabic: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 239: Line 239:
Their forms have become more similar to each other due to analogy.  
Their forms have become more similar to each other due to analogy.  


Knench maintains a distinction between independent and dependent forms for finite verbs, like Old Irish. The independent forms come from the Ancient Knench waw-consecutive. Using a preverb such as ''lu'' 'not', ''xi'' 'that', or ''śə'' '(emphatic preverb, from the infinitive absolute *3aśū of *3aśō 'to do')' requires the dependent form. Dependent past forms and future forms are formally identical to independent future forms and past forms, respectively, except forms of ''juð'' 'to be' and ''śuð'' 'to do' which are a little different from the independent forms.
Knench maintains a distinction between independent and dependent forms for finite verbs, like Old Irish. The independent forms come from the Ancient Knench waw-consecutive. Using a preverb such as ''lu'' 'not', ''xi'' 'that', or ''śə'' '(emphatic preverb, from the infinitive absolute *3aśū of *3aśō 'to do')' requires the dependent form. Dependent past forms and future forms are formally identical to independent future forms and past forms, respectively, except forms of ''juð'' 'to be'.


Even verbs with finite forms are defective verbs, since finite forms are always perfective (except forms of ''juð''). To express the imperfective with these verbs, you still have to use the copula + bə + VN construction. The negator ''lu'' only negates finite verbs.
Even verbs with finite forms are defective verbs, since finite forms are always perfective (except forms of ''juð''). To express the imperfective with these verbs, you still have to use the copula + bə + VN construction. The negator ''lu'' only negates finite verbs.
Line 307: Line 307:
!rowspan=2| ''śuð''  
!rowspan=2| ''śuð''  
! future indep.
! future indep.
| ''wąht i''
| ''fowð i''
| ''wąht tə''
| ''fows tə''
| ''wąht ti''
| ''fows ti''
| ''wąś u''
| ''fow u''
| ''wąś oj''
| ''foəl oj''
| ''wąś nu''
| ''fown nu''
| ''wąht tim''
| ''fows tim''
| ''wąśu'm''
| ''folu'm''
|-
|-
! past indep.
! past indep.
Line 327: Line 327:
|-
|-
!rowspan=2| ''buð''  
!rowspan=2| ''buð''  
! past indep.
! future indep.
| ''powð i''
| ''powð i''
| ''pows tə''
| ''pows tə''
| ''pows ti''
| ''pows ti''
| ''pow u''
| ''pow u''
| ''pól oj''
| ''poəl oj''
| ''pown nu''
| ''pown nu''
| ''pows tim''
| ''pows tim''
| ''pu'm''
| ''polu'm''
|-
|-
! future indep.
! past indep.
| ''weð i''
| ''weð i''
| ''þes tə''
| ''þes tə''
138,726

edits

Navigation menu