Linguifex:Arbitration/Requests/Case: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 29: Line 29:


=== Statement by {Party 3} ===
=== Statement by {Party 3} ===
I claim that Waahlis should not have rolled back my blanking of my talk page, and then further justified it with policies he implemented after said blanking.<br/>I have provided examples from both the German Federal and Swedish constitutions where both of those disallow such retroactive application of new policies as a general guideline to show that such retroactive application of new policies isn't endorsed by at least two democratic nations.<br/>18:09, 16 January 2013 (CET)
I claim that Waahlis should not have rolled back my blanking of my talk page, and then further justified it with policies he implemented after said blanking.<br/>I have provided examples from both the German Federal and Swedish constitutions where both of those disallow such retroactive application of new policies as a general guideline to show that such retroactive application of new policies isn't endorsed by at least two democratic nations.<br/>Furthermore, I claim he used his administrative powers to introduce said policy to spite me, which constitutes an abuse of authority.<br/>18:09, 16 January 2013 (CET)


=== Clerk notes ===
=== Clerk notes ===
51

edits

Navigation menu