Yama-pali-auk: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
m (writing: added the file extension to the aforementioned visual)
mNo edit summary
Line 56: Line 56:
if the nucleus of a syllable uses the filler character, it is likely being used as a mathematical variable. that's actually a legacy feature from back when i kept a journal for my random thoughts. now i can share them with other people so this feature is obsolete, but cool. however, a fully blank syllable is used as a general "bad word". think your fucks or shits. it, by definition, cannot be romanized or pronounced, but it can be written, which the language is meant to be.
if the nucleus of a syllable uses the filler character, it is likely being used as a mathematical variable. that's actually a legacy feature from back when i kept a journal for my random thoughts. now i can share them with other people so this feature is obsolete, but cool. however, a fully blank syllable is used as a general "bad word". think your fucks or shits. it, by definition, cannot be romanized or pronounced, but it can be written, which the language is meant to be.
<br>
<br>
a fun cosmetic feature is that you can write in any direction you want, provided you mirror/rotate the glyphs accordingly and indicate a change in direction with an arrow. if no arrow is present, assume the previous line's reading direction. if there is no arrow or previous line, assume left-to-right.
a fun cosmetic feature is that you can write in any direction you want, provided you mirror/rotate the glyphs accordingly and indicate a change in direction with an arrow. if no arrow is present, assume the previous line's reading direction. if there is no arrow or previous line, assume left-to-right. <br>
[[File:Y-p-a omnidirectional writing.png|alt=An image showcasing omnidirectional writing in yama-pali-auk.|what omnidirectional writing could look like in practice]]
[[File:Y-p-a omnidirectional writing.png|alt=An image showcasing omnidirectional writing in yama-pali-auk.|what omnidirectional writing could look like in practice]]


== grammar ==
== grammar ==
yama-pali-auk has mostly free word order, the only requirement being that the subject is somewhere before the object. this is due to the lack of a subject or object marker. the verb, however, is clear, as it is marked for tense. [SECTION INCOMPLETE FUTURE KATH FIX THIS]
yama-pali-auk has mostly free word order, the only requirement being that the subject is somewhere before the object. this is due to the lack of a subject or object marker. the verb, however, is clear, as it is marked for tense. [SECTION INCOMPLETE FUTURE KATH FIX THIS]
27

edits

Navigation menu