105
edits
Caryatic: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Evaluation
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
* I may have overdone the small case system. | * I may have overdone the small case system. | ||
* The tense/aspect system is a bit confused. | * The tense/aspect system is a bit confused. | ||
* A lot of the sound changes seem wildly implausible | * A lot of the sound changes seem wildly implausible. | ||
* In particular, while "[[#Sigmatization|sigmatization]]" seemed like a cool idea at the time, it now strikes me as confusing and generally a pain. | ** In particular, while "[[#Sigmatization|sigmatization]]" seemed like a cool idea at the time, it now strikes me as confusing and generally a pain. | ||
** The treatment of laryngeals is also a little too creative. | |||
* A phonemic bilabial~labiovelar contrast? Seriously?? | |||
* I was not very careful about the ordering of the soundlaws, resulting in many contradictions. | * I was not very careful about the ordering of the soundlaws, resulting in many contradictions. | ||
* David Salo has suggested that it is unrealistic that the stops are never voiced under any conditions. (Perhaps I should make a rule that the unaspirated stops retain voicing when adjacent to a sonorant? In any case this is not the rule as things stand.) | * David Salo has suggested that it is unrealistic that the stops are never voiced under any conditions. (Perhaps I should make a rule that the unaspirated stops retain voicing when adjacent to a sonorant? In any case this is not the rule as things stand.) | ||