Vėtuhapamarėska: Difference between revisions

Line 365: Line 365:
'''Notes:'''
'''Notes:'''
# Both endings could be reconstructed for 1st person singular in present tense. The former ending is from Eastern dialects, the latter - from Western ones.
# Both endings could be reconstructed for 1st person singular in present tense. The former ending is from Eastern dialects, the latter - from Western ones.
# According to the modern language the -ais ending is reconstructible for 2nd person singular in past tense, but the form -ēi was attested. However it is not precisely known whether the -ēi ending was real or it could be a misspelling.
# According to the modern language the ''-ais'' ending is reconstructible for 2nd person singular in past tense, but the form ''-ēi'' was attested. However it is not precisely known whether the -ēi ending was real or it could be a misspelling.
 
An interesting feature Old Pomorian verbs possessed was a presence of objective clitics. These clitics were attached to the end of prefixless transitive verbs or to the beginning of transitive verbs with prefixes to show a direct object. Those clitics are seldom used in North-Western dialects of the modern language, but are considered archaic. Pronouns in accusative case are used instead nowadays.
{| class="wikitable"  style="text-align: center"
! person
! Singular || Dual || Plural
|-
! 1st
| -mej-/-mi- || -vās-/-vā- || -mes-/-me-
|-
! 2nd
| -tej-/-ti- || -tās-/-tā- || tes-/-te-
|-
|}
Clitics could be attached in all tenses and moods and didn't change their form like real verb personal endings. However they had long form (if the verb began in a vowel) and short (if the verb began in a consonant). There was no clitic for a third person, a corresponding pronoun was always used in that case. There was also a similar '''reflexive clitic''' (-sej-/-si-) which made a verb intransitive. For example: ''nātigēdjau'' means "I asked you", ''nāsigēdjesi'' is "you ask yourself".


==Development==
==Development==
2,334

edits