Scellan/Syntax: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 122: Line 122:
*no relativizer is used when the head is the subject in the relative clause
*no relativizer is used when the head is the subject in the relative clause
*''ry'' is used otherwise, possibly with a resumptive pronoun
*''ry'' is used otherwise, possibly with a resumptive pronoun
*resumptive pronouns are optional - hence relative clauses can end in a preposition as in English.
*resumptive pronouns are optional - hence relative clauses can end in a preposition as in English
**This state of affairs came about because the older resumptive pronominal affixes on prepositions elided and the emphatic pronoun remained optional.
**This state of affairs came about because the older resumptive pronominal affixes on prepositions elided and the emphatic pronoun remained optional.
*for places, ''cah'' 'there' can be used as a resumptive pronoun
*for places, ''cah'' 'there' can be used as a resumptive pronoun
*in formal writing, the head may be repeated instead of using a resumptive pronoun to eliminate ambiguity (cf. mathematical writing)
*in formal writing, the head may be repeated instead of using a resumptive pronoun to eliminate ambiguity (cf. mathematical writing)
*For relativizing sentences or statements, ''taw'' 'what' is used
*for relativizing sentences or statements, ''taw'' 'what' is used
:'''''... taw þuþmoŋéed emb vyðár tyþ.'''''
:'''''... taw þuþmoŋéed emb vyðár tyþ.'''''
:what confirm COMP equal two
:what confirm COMP equal two
139,495

edits

Navigation menu