4,735
edits
User talk:Waahlis: Difference between revisions
→Hano: new section
EmperorZelos (talk | contribs) (→Rostovism: new section) |
Chrysophylax (talk | contribs) (→Hano: new section) |
||
| Line 247: | Line 247: | ||
Why are there so much vandalism lately? [[File:Zelos.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User Talk:EmperorZelos|<span style="color:#800080;">Emperor Zelos</span>]]''' 07:35, 10 December 2012 (CET) | Why are there so much vandalism lately? [[File:Zelos.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User Talk:EmperorZelos|<span style="color:#800080;">Emperor Zelos</span>]]''' 07:35, 10 December 2012 (CET) | ||
== Hano == | |||
The [[Hano|page]] is currently marked and risks deletion for "Patent nonsense". Isn't that a tad harsh and incorrect? I mean, I do not see in which world | |||
:''“Hano includes three grammatical numbers: singular, dual and plural, of which dual exists only in personal pronouns.'' | |||
:''It has three noun classes: concrete animate, concrete inanimate and abstract. All nouns are plural by default and the singular is marked by adding a suffix to the end of the noun”'' | |||
would be classified as gibberish. I concede the page being quite incomplete and relatively inactive (last edit by author was back in November) but I feel strongly that section G.1 is not applicable here for which I have reverted your edit. [[File:Admin.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Chrysophylax|<span style="color: #3366BB ;">Chrysophylax</span>]]''' 19:55, 12 December 2012 (CET) | |||