User:Ceige/Niche Grammar: Difference between revisions

 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Quick Phonological Overview==
===Consonants===
:: {| class="bluetable lightbluebg" style="text-align: center;"
|-
!
! Labial !! Dental !! Palatal !! Dorsal
|-
! Plosives & Affricates
| p, b || t, d || č, dž || k, g
|-
! Classical Fricatives
| f || s, (th) || š || h
|-
! Classical Sonorants
| v || (r) || j || (l)
|-
! Nasals
| m || n || ň || (ng)
|}
===Vowels===
* '''Monophthong phonemes:'''
<!-- : {| class="bluetable lightbluebg" style="text-align: center;"
|-
! !! Front !! Centre !! Back
|-
! Closed
| i ⟨i⟩, i: ⟨ee⟩ ||colspan=2| u: ⟨oo⟩
|-
! Mid
| e ⟨e⟩, ei || ə: ⟨eu⟩ || o ⟨o⟩, o: ⟨oe⟩
|-
! Open
| æ ||colspan=2| a:
|}-->
:: {| class="bluetable lightbluebg" style="text-align: center;"
|-
! !! Front !! Center !! Back
|-
! Closed
| i ||rowspan=2| ø || u
|-
! Mid
| e || o
|-
! Open
|colspan=3| a
|}
* '''Diphthong phonemes:'''
:: {| class="bluetable lightbluebg" style="text-align: center;"
|-
! !! Front !! Back
|-
! Closed
|colspan=2| ju
|-
! Open-Mid
|colspan=2| ei
|-
! Open
| (ai) || (au)
|}
* '''Vowel length:''' Vowels use similar conditions to Germanic languages to determine vowel length.<!--Stressed?--> Vowels in a open syllables are habitually long, while vowels in a closed syllable are habitually short.
===Phonological Processes===
<!--* '''Sonority-hierarchy driven metathesis?'''-->
* '''Monosyllabisation:''' Words and roots are reduced by sound change to one main syllable, with consonant clusters being reduced to a set of features modifying a nuclear consonant:
:* C̊m-, C̊n- C̊ň- > m̊, n̊, ň̊ (nasal voiceless continuant) > f, s, š
:* Np, Nt, Nk > b, d, g
:* tr, kl > s, h?
<!--exceptions: Cr > CVrV?-->
==Quick Grammatical Overview==
==Quick Grammatical Overview==
===Nouns===
===Nouns===
Line 5: Line 77:
:: Cat POSS = the cat's owner.
:: Cat POSS = the cat's owner.
:: Cat POSS Joe = Joe's cat.
:: Cat POSS Joe = Joe's cat.
===Verbs===
* '''Nominalisation:''' Just about everything can be nominalised with the nominalisation particle.
===Verbs & Syntax===
* '''Separation of noun-phrases by verbs:''' The language's syntax is strongly guided by the principle of preventing noun phrases with limited marking from coming in contact by placing verbs between them whenever possible. See below for the effects of this phenomenon.
* '''SV₂OV₁ order:''' In sentences with only one verb, the word order is SVO; however in sentences with multiple verbs, the first verb goes at the end of the sentence (but before word final particles) and the other verbs go between the subject and object. Inspired by possible naive linguistic analyses of the function of "gern(e)" in German in sentences talking about wants and desires.
* '''SV₂OV₁ order:''' In sentences with only one verb, the word order is SVO; however in sentences with multiple verbs, the first verb goes at the end of the sentence (but before word final particles) and the other verbs go between the subject and object. Inspired by possible naive linguistic analyses of the function of "gern(e)" in German in sentences talking about wants and desires.
* '''Alignment:''' Austronesianesque, with the following:
* '''Alignment:''' Austronesianesque, with the following:
Line 12: Line 86:
:: In intransitive sentences, the main argument is not marked, or, ''for a twist'', is marked with a copulaic particle where appropriate. Inspired by  
:: In intransitive sentences, the main argument is not marked, or, ''for a twist'', is marked with a copulaic particle where appropriate. Inspired by  
* '''Verb Agreement marking:''' Verbs are marked to agree with subject nouns, and can be marked according to '''number''', personal gender, or some sort of '''honorific ranking''' (which can like in Japanese apply to inanimate things like 「お酒」). But rarely are all three used. Bolded are the categories I would like to focus on.
* '''Verb Agreement marking:''' Verbs are marked to agree with subject nouns, and can be marked according to '''number''', personal gender, or some sort of '''honorific ranking''' (which can like in Japanese apply to inanimate things like 「お酒」). But rarely are all three used. Bolded are the categories I would like to focus on.
* '''Word initial TAM phrases?'''
* '''Sentence initial TAM phrases?'''
 
===Questions===
===Questions===
* '''Yes/No questions:''' Yes/no questions are preceded by a stock phrase (cf. French ''est-ce que'', Indonesian ''apakah''), or optionally, the V₁ comes to the start of the sentences, such that SV₂OV₁ becomes V₁SV₂O, '''OR''' an auxiliary verb (''or transitive copula?'') enters the scene (like English ''do'' as V₁), resulting in V₁SV₃…OV₂ or V₁SV₂V₃…O. The former-most and latter-most are considered the most well recognised.
* '''Yes/No questions:''' Yes/no questions are preceded by a stock phrase (cf. French ''est-ce que'', Indonesian ''apakah''), or optionally, the V₁ comes to the start of the sentences, such that SV₂OV₁ becomes V₁SV₂O, '''OR''' an auxiliary verb (''or transitive copula?'') enters the scene (like English ''do'' as V₁), resulting in V₁SV₃…OV₂ or V₁SV₂V₃…O. The former-most and latter-most are considered the most well recognised.
* '''Questions about anything other than the subject:''' More English-esque nonsense here using the ''do''-esque auxiliary, resulting in O<sup>{{small|q}}</sup>V<sup>{{small|do}}</sup>SV(VOV)
* '''Questions about anything other than the subject:''' More English-esque nonsense here using the ''do''-esque auxiliary, resulting in O<sup>{{small|q}}</sup>V<sup>{{small|do}}</sup>SV(VOV)
870

edits