Linguifex talk:Announcements: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Fauxlosophe (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Chrysophylax (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Am I the only one who second guesses linguifices as the best demonym for us? I mean I'm not going full Latin pronunciation here, but I sort of read it as liŋ.ɡwi.fiːsiːz, or at least similar enough to it. -[[User:Fauxlosophe|Fauxlosophe]] ([[User talk:Fauxlosophe|talk]]) 16:22, 21 August 2013 (CEST) | Am I the only one who second guesses linguifices as the best demonym for us? I mean I'm not going full Latin pronunciation here, but I sort of read it as liŋ.ɡwi.fiːsiːz, or at least similar enough to it. -[[User:Fauxlosophe|Fauxlosophe]] ([[User talk:Fauxlosophe|talk]]) 16:22, 21 August 2013 (CEST) | ||
haha, true, it's not very friendly for illatinate; I believe the use of linguifices in English was a bit of a joke on our part ;) but in generais I think 'conlangers', 'conlangers on Linguifex' are fine enough :p --[[File:Admin.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Chrysophylax|<span style="color: #3366BB ;">Chrysophylax</span>]]''' 21:04, 21 August 2013 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 19:04, 21 August 2013
Am I the only one who second guesses linguifices as the best demonym for us? I mean I'm not going full Latin pronunciation here, but I sort of read it as liŋ.ɡwi.fiːsiːz, or at least similar enough to it. -Fauxlosophe (talk) 16:22, 21 August 2013 (CEST)
haha, true, it's not very friendly for illatinate; I believe the use of linguifices in English was a bit of a joke on our part ;) but in generais I think 'conlangers', 'conlangers on Linguifex' are fine enough :p --
Chrysophylax 21:04, 21 August 2013 (CEST)