User:Chrysophylax/pa1: Difference between revisions

From Linguifex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Concerning a few shared lexical items of the agricultural and mineral domains in the word stock of the Tjero-Khazian and Tenarian families. ==Introduction== For a long time s...")
 
mNo edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


==Introduction==
==Introduction==
For a long time scholars have harboured suspicions regarding the general similarity between a few words concerning trees and gemstones in Gharian and Tenarian. I postulate a shared intense period of lexical contact 5000 BP between a late form of Proto-Tjero-Khazian (PTK) and an early stage of Proto-Tenarian (PT).  
For a long time scholars have harboured suspicions regarding the general similarity between a select set of words concerning trees and gemstones in the Tjero-Khazian and Tenarian languages. I postulate a shared period of intense lexical contact 5000 BP between a late form of Proto-Tjero-Khazian (PTK) and an early stage of Proto-Tenarian (PT).  


==Part 1 : From Proto-Tenarian to Proto-Tjero-Khazian==
==Part 1 : From Proto-Tenarian to Proto-Tjero-Khazian==
===STONE===
===STONE===
#{{rec|ot’o-k’}}, {{rec|ot’o-moχ}}  
#{{rec|ot’o-k}}, {{rec|ot’o-moχ}}  
#:Khz. ''ašakh'' ‘stone’,  ''ašamô'' ‘gravel’; Tjer. ru’ut ‘jewel’.
#:Khz. ''ašakh'' ‘stone’,  ''ašamô'' ‘gravel’; Tjer. ru’ut ‘jewel’.
#:The root for stone, tentatively isolated as *ot’o-, formally matches Proto-Tenarian *oʔto (Cf. OVa. ''ooton'' ‘aquamarine’, West Lilli ''vodoig'' ‘jewelry box’ ( < Late PT. *oʔte-ns {accusative form} ). The lack of class suffixes in the Tenarian family hints to the origins of this root being placed in Proto-Tenarian.  
#:The root for stone, tentatively isolated as *ot’o-, is a close match of PT. *oʔto (Cf. OVa. ''ooton'' ‘aquamarine’, WLi. ''vodoig'' ‘jewelry box’ ( < Late PT. *oʔte-ns {accusative form} ). The lack of class suffixes in the Tenarian daughters' reflexes hints to the origins of this root being in Proto-Tenarian.  
 
#{{rec|laχa-}}
#{{rec|laχa-}}
#:Khz. ''alâri'' ‘ruby’ ( < {{rec|laχa-zi}}), Tjer. ''lahaze'' ‘blue dye’ (id.), ''lahanu'' ‘blueberries’ ( < {{rec|laχa-moχ}}).
#:Khz. ''alâri'' ‘ruby’ ( < {{rec|laχa-zi}}); Tjer. ''lahaze'' ‘blue dye’ (id.), ''lahanu'' ‘blueberries’ ( < {{rec|laχa-moχ}}).
#:Proto-Tenarian *təlaqa ‘chisel’, composed of *təla- ‘hard’ and -qa ‘tool-suffix’, offers an interesting opportunity for resolving this item. It is not inconceivable that an early variant of Proto-Tenarian which had already dropped the weak schwa would result in *tlaqa. If this is the variant that was loaned, the forbidden onset cluster *tl would have been resolved by simple deletion of the first element, as seen in the oldest strata of Proto-Indo-European loanwords (Cf. PTK {{rec|lat’o-k’}} < PIE. [[wiktionary:Appendix:Proto-Indo-European/telh%E2%82%82-|*tḷh₂tós]]).
#:PT. *təlaqa ‘chisel’, composed of *təla- ‘hard’ and -qa ‘tool-suffix’, offers an interesting opportunity for resolving this item. It is not inconceivable that an early variant of Proto-Tenarian which had already dropped the weak schwa would result in *tlaqa. If this is the variant that was loaned, the forbidden onset cluster *tl would have been resolved by simple deletion of the first element as seen in the oldest strata of Proto-Indo-European loanwords (cf. Khz. ''lašaddu'' ‘suffering’ < PTK {{rec|lat’o-k}} < PIE. [[wiktionary:Appendix:Proto-Indo-European/telh%E2%82%82-|*tḷh₂tós]]).

Latest revision as of 02:59, 4 February 2015

Concerning a few shared lexical items of the agricultural and mineral domains in the word stock of the Tjero-Khazian and Tenarian families.

Introduction

For a long time scholars have harboured suspicions regarding the general similarity between a select set of words concerning trees and gemstones in the Tjero-Khazian and Tenarian languages. I postulate a shared period of intense lexical contact 5000 BP between a late form of Proto-Tjero-Khazian (PTK) and an early stage of Proto-Tenarian (PT).

Part 1 : From Proto-Tenarian to Proto-Tjero-Khazian

STONE

  1. *ot’o-k, *ot’o-moχ
    Khz. ašakh ‘stone’, ašamô ‘gravel’; Tjer. ru’ut ‘jewel’.
    The root for stone, tentatively isolated as *ot’o-, is a close match of PT. *oʔto (Cf. OVa. ooton ‘aquamarine’, WLi. vodoig ‘jewelry box’ ( < Late PT. *oʔte-ns {accusative form} ). The lack of class suffixes in the Tenarian daughters' reflexes hints to the origins of this root being in Proto-Tenarian.
  2. *laχa-
    Khz. alâri ‘ruby’ ( < *laχa-zi); Tjer. lahaze ‘blue dye’ (id.), lahanu ‘blueberries’ ( < *laχa-moχ).
    PT. *təlaqa ‘chisel’, composed of *təla- ‘hard’ and -qa ‘tool-suffix’, offers an interesting opportunity for resolving this item. It is not inconceivable that an early variant of Proto-Tenarian which had already dropped the weak schwa would result in *tlaqa. If this is the variant that was loaned, the forbidden onset cluster *tl would have been resolved by simple deletion of the first element as seen in the oldest strata of Proto-Indo-European loanwords (cf. Khz. lašaddu ‘suffering’ < PTK *lat’o-k < PIE. *tḷh₂tós).