File talk:ConlangWikia.png: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
EmperorZelos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Haha... :p Yeah, but that is after all not the wiki itself, but rather Wikia... Nevertheless, I might decide to get rid of it alltogether! But it will plausibly stay. [[File:Waahlis.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Waahlis|<span style="color: Orange;">Waahlis</span>]]''' 19:05, 29 December 2012 (CET) | Haha... :p Yeah, but that is after all not the wiki itself, but rather Wikia... Nevertheless, I might decide to get rid of it alltogether! But it will plausibly stay. [[File:Waahlis.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Waahlis|<span style="color: Orange;">Waahlis</span>]]''' 19:05, 29 December 2012 (CET) | ||
if it does stay put a warning disclaimer about the wikias practices of disrepsect and hostage taking. [[File:Zelos.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User Talk:EmperorZelos|<span style="color:#800080;">Emperor Zelos</span>]]''' 07:52, 30 December 2012 (CET) |
Latest revision as of 06:52, 30 December 2012
whyyy? Juding by all we should not allow this shit here Emperor Zelos 14:50, 28 December 2012 (CET)
I was expecting that. :p Although you ought to take a few things into consideration - this is in fact Chrysophylax' wiki. He has no reason to dislike Wikia. In addition, the new members of these wiki hardly need to get involved in the past. We are supposed to provide objective information and alternatives after all. Also, surely we cannot hold grudges for all eternity. And I recall MOB's and admin on Wikia as well...! ;) Waahlis 15:44, 28 December 2012 (CET)
While it may technically be "mine", I prefer to see it as a community-guided "mine". Just calling it Chrysophylax' seems a bit too autocratic. xD But to the actual dispute: Yes, Waahlis has, in my opinion, valid arguments. This is a wiki, a repository of supposedly objective information. We must not stoop to petty feuds and such. It reflects bad upon us mostly and scares users. The Conlang Wikia has some interesting languages there, providing a mere notice of existence of this other place, I think is not something we should shy from. Chrysophylax 06:16, 29 December 2012 (CET)
Well, 'tis yours in the sense that you are the owner, as well as it differs from the former trio of administrators being the only influence. Thank you, but considering I was running a fever when I wrote the above paragraph, I scarcely remember putting it as I did... Of course, we won't do anything to actively promote the wiki, since we do compete. That doesn't stop us from providing an alternative. Waahlis 08:21, 29 December 2012 (CET)
I think we should if ANYTHING provide a disclaimer that states that anything put on that wiki will not be respected for itnellectual property and they hold anything hostage there. Emperor Zelos 18:28, 29 December 2012 (CET)
Haha... :p Yeah, but that is after all not the wiki itself, but rather Wikia... Nevertheless, I might decide to get rid of it alltogether! But it will plausibly stay. Waahlis 19:05, 29 December 2012 (CET)
if it does stay put a warning disclaimer about the wikias practices of disrepsect and hostage taking. Emperor Zelos 07:52, 30 December 2012 (CET)