Rówok: Difference between revisions
Chrysophylax (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 237: | Line 237: | ||
===Prosody=== | ===Prosody=== | ||
Prosody is not unlike something you'd | Prosody is not unlike something you'd hear in the South Slavic languages. It is not particularly singsongy, and a lot of consonant clusters perhaps give Rówok a a bit of a rough sound. Nonetheless, there is a lot of epenthesis, augment, and other interesting vocalic patterns that nonetheless give the language an aesthetic flow and lends itself to mellifluous constructions, even if they might not be a characteristic of common speech. | ||
====Stress==== | ====Stress==== |
Revision as of 22:22, 31 March 2017
Rówok | |
---|---|
Rówok | |
Pronunciation | [[Help:IPA|ro:wok]] |
Created by | Ioscius |
Date | 1200 |
Setting | Vaguely undefined pre-industrial period, thought to be around 1200 CE. |
Native speakers | ~10,000 () |
Proto-Ruk
| |
Early form | Ruk
|
Official status | |
Regulated by | Intertribal agreement |
- Nota bene, care lector, this is a work in progress
Rówok is an artlang created by Ioscius.
It is the only known daughter language of the as yet presumed language isolate Ruk.
Introduction
Setting
Spoken by a rather reclusive community that lived high in the preindustrial Ural range, Ruk was an extremely isolating language, with largely monosyllabic words and next to no inflection of any sort. Rówok on the other hand is morphologically complex. This is the result of the Ruk speakers, after centuries of living mostly on their own, having underwent a period of dispersion and travel through lands inhabited by Finnic and Slavic speakers. This resulted in both a cultural explosion and a rapid evolution of the language, as affected by analogy with speakers picking up the languages of the peoples they mingled with.
Armed with new knowledge and now speaking a radically altered language, the nation moved back up to the hills, and Rówok represents a stage of the language's evolution in about the 3rd generation of leveling after their return to the homeland. It is mostly stable, but there are some forms still competing for widespread acceptance (cf., e.g., copula).
Rówok speakers live in a mountainous, forest environment with snow-cover nearly year round, with just a tiny bit of summer of which to speak. They are intimately dependent and symbiotic with their dogs, and there are thus many, many semantic elements of or relating to canines and canine/human interaction, not to mention a huge amount of idioms containing references to dogs. Lastly they are extremely mathematically, if not technically, advanced and utterly areligious.
Design goals
The main motive behind creating Rówok was to explore patient and agent relationships, and to employ and self-indulgently tweak and torture a complex and fully productive middle voice system.
Other motivating (syntactical) considerations were:
- trying a set of uniform case endings (barring vowel harmony and reduction) instead of the typical IE several declension patterns, so that all the case endings are recognizable throughout all grammatical numbers
- a vague attempt at trying vowel harmony in a conlang
- blurring the lines between adjective/substantive/verb, so the same root can easily be used in any of those categories, and implicitly an extensive participial system
- having a strict and productive dual in all applicable grammatical categories
Inspiration
Rówok’s creator placed the speech community where he did, wanting to steal liberally from both Finnic and Slavic semantics and grammar without having to justify himself to anyone. You could say the natlangs that had the greatest impact on the author’s aesthetics and inspirations were Latin, Ancient Greek, Pan-Slavic, Finnic and Sami, just a tiny bit of Basque, and enormous inspiration from the author’s absolute favorite, simply darling language that he’s never learned: Guarani.
Phonology
Rówok's phonology is fairly conservative, a result primarily of the author's desire to be able to actually speak it.
All of the sounds are found in English, save for /r̝/.
Notable absences from the phonology are /f/ and /h/, especially noting that /p/, /b/, /v/, and /g/ and /k/ all exist.
Orthography
Rówok is written using largely the Latin alphabet as extended for South Slavic, with the addition of <ŧ> for the voiceless interdental fricative /θ/, and <đ> is used for the voiced interdental fricative /ð/, instead of for /dʑ/ in South Slavic.
There is also <ř> to indicate the same sound as in its inspiration in Czech, namely /r̝/.
That gives us in Latin order:
a b d đ č e g i k l m n o p r ř s š t ŧ u v w y z ž
See the alphabet grouped by feature in the tables below.
Consonants
Labial | Interdental | Alveolar | Postalveolar | Velar | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
unvoiced | voiced | unvoiced | voiced | unvoiced | voiced | unvoiced | voiced | unvoiced | voiced | |
Stops | p /p/ | b /b/ | t /t/ | d /d/ | k /k/ | g /g/ | ||||
Nasals | m /m/ | n /n/ | ||||||||
Affricates | č /tʃ/ | |||||||||
Fricatives | v /v/ | ŧ /θ/ | đ /ð/ | s /s/ | z /z/ | š /ʃ/ | ž /ʒ/ | |||
Liquids | w /w/ | l /l/ | r /r/+ | y /j/ | ||||||
Trills | ř /r̝/ |
Vowels
Front | Central | Back | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
short | long | short | long | short | long | |
Close | i /i/ | í /iː/ | u /u/ | ú /uː/ | ||
Mid | e /e/ | é /eː/ | o /o/ | ó /oː/ | ||
Open | a /a/ | á /aː/ |
Word structure
Roots in Rówok are overwhelmingly triglyphs, with /a/ being the only vowel that can occur either initially in a root, or medially. All roots have an underlying "theme vowel" for lack of a better term in the author's attempt at vowel harmony, either /a/ or /o/, which shift to /e/ and /u/ in perfect verbal stems and many nouns derived from verbal stems. Additionally words with /w/ in any position have some stems where /w/ is reduced to [u]. The rules are simple for the majority of stems, and are as follows:
- If /a/ appears in the root (by law only initially or medially), the theme vowel is automatically /a/. If the root is tri-consonantal and does not contain /w/, the theme vowel is also /a/. As a note, roots with medial /a/ are almost exclusively (specific) plants, and thus lack verbal roots, and thus have only two principal parts: nom/erg/voc, and oblique.
- If /w/ appears medially or finally in a root, the theme vowel is /o/.
Exceptions:
- There are some rare, quad-consonantal roots. These are always of the the form C*XCC, where C* can only be /b/, /p/, /d/, /t/, /g/, /k/, /z/ and /s/, and X can be /w/, /l/, or /r/; ones with /w/ have /o/ as the theme vowel, and those with /l/ or /r/ have /a/.
- Roots with initial /w/ are very old stems and anything goes as far as theme vowels; this is the only word type whose vowel structure isn’t deducible from the form of the root and just need to be learned.
Phonotactics
Vowel harmony
See aspect.
Prosody
Prosody is not unlike something you'd hear in the South Slavic languages. It is not particularly singsongy, and a lot of consonant clusters perhaps give Rówok a a bit of a rough sound. Nonetheless, there is a lot of epenthesis, augment, and other interesting vocalic patterns that nonetheless give the language an aesthetic flow and lends itself to mellifluous constructions, even if they might not be a characteristic of common speech.
Stress
Every word has a primary stress accent, which tends toward the penult or antepenult, and the language is stabilizing to a system like the Latin one, just that the length of the syllable determining the penult or antepenult is based solely on position, as there are no phonemic long vowels in Rówok.
After the primary stress in tri- and more-syllabic words all successive vowels are reduced to schwa, but not in disyllabic words (cf. rówok /ro:wok/, but razánka /raza:nkə/)
Intonation
Morphophonology
Morphology
Roots and principal parts
Dictionary entries are listed with principal parts in the following order:
- lemma - definition; finite verbal stem-, participial stem (de facto the nom/erg singular imperfect active participle), vocative stem+, ergative/nominative form, oblique stem-, adverbial form
- +The similative and partitive cases are also based on the vocative stem, as well as adjectives.
As explained above in the phonology section, verbal stems tend to group in (C)VCC and participial stems in (C)V(C)C; nominative/ergative stems tend to be CVCVC, and oblique nominal stems CCVC if allowed by phonotactics. Unstressed epenthetics are inserted where needed, giving possible ^VCC(C/V) instead of expected CC(C/V), or CVCVC instead of expected CCVC.
Examples, starting with theme vowel [a]:
medial /a/:
- pan - moss; pan, pna-
Triconsonantal roots with no /w/ and those with medial /w/ are the easiest. Both are very regular in their pattern.
With medial liquid:
- srn - claw; sarn-, srn, srna, sáran, srán-, sarná
- drb - fall/to fall/fallen; darb-, drb, drba, dárab, dráb-, darbá
- bls - snow; bals-, bls, blsa, bálas, blás-, balsá
non-liquid medial:
- bgs - bags-, bags, bágsa, bágas, bagás-+, bagsá
- zpt - zapt-, zapt, zápta, zápat, zpát-+, zaptá
- +If the cluster is not allowed initially, like [bg], epenthetic /a/ is inserted. Further, /zp/ is definitely going to be realized as [zb]
- ddz - idle mischief/fiddling/to idle about; dadz-, dadz, dádza, dádaz, đaz-+, dadzá
- +if a reduplicated letter can fricativize/affricatize, it will in the oblique nominal stem
- pps - imitation/to fake/artificial; paps-, paps, pápsa, pápas, pas-+, papsá
- +if the reduplicated consonant cannot fricativize, it reduces so ppas=>pas (since /f/ is lacking in the inventory).
There are variations if the initial or medial consonant is /y/, where /y/=>/i/:
- dym - light/shine/bright; daym-, dim, díma, dáyam, dyamá-, dimá
- ryz - seed/to plant/incipient; rayz-, riz, ríza, ráyaz, ryazá-, rizá
- ygn - a cared for object/to rear/lovingly; yágn-, ígan, igána, yágan, igná-, yagná
Roots with initial /a/:
- azl - life; ázl-, zal, zála, azála, azalá-, zalá
- ayt - run; áyt-, yat, yáta, ayáta, ayatá-, yatá
- akb - count; ákb-, kab, kába, akába, akabá-, kabá
Now examples where /o/ is the theme vowel, starting with medial /w/:
- pwt - clearing/to clear/deobstructed; powt-, pot, put, pówot, pwót-, putú
- rwk - tongue/speak/of or relating to tongue or speech/language; rowk-, rok, ruk, rówok, orwók-, rukú+
- +as a semantic tidbit, Rukú is how you would say "in Rowok", as opposed to rwógdo (tongue.inst) "(doing something) with your tongue", and Ruk is the name of Rowok's protolanguage.
final /w/:
- gdw - tool/to fashion/skillful; gódw-, gdo, gódu/gódw-+, gódow, gdów-, godú
- +In roots with final /w/ the vocative is CóCu, while the similative and partitive are built off of CoCw
- lsw - running water/flow/fluent; lósw-, ólso, lósu/losw-, lósow, olswó-+, losú
- +A similar variation as above when a final /w/ root begins with /y/:
- ybw - still water; yóbw-, íbow, íbu, yóbow, ibwó-, ibú
Cw/r/lCC:
- p(w)zn - non potable water, to flow destructively, to pollute; powzn-, pozn, pwózno, powózon, pzón-, puznú
- brds - to lie, fib, in the middle to bullshit; bards-, bards, brádsa, barádas-, brdás-, bradsá
The occasional initial /w/, some a-stems, some o-stems, lots of /u/ even in imperfect stems and even in words that otherwise have /a/ as their theme vowel:
- wst - sky; wásta-, wast, ústa, awásata, áwsat-, ustá
- wkd - kill; úkdo-, úkod, úkud, wókod, úkod-, kudú
Finite verbal stem
Participial stem
(de facto the nom/erg singular imperfect active participle)
Vocative stem
Ergative/nominative form
Oblique stem
Adverbial form
The adverbial form of a verb has a couple of meanings:
- as a simple adverb
- following a noun in the nominative it functions as an adjective
- following a noun in the instrumental it functions like a Latin ablative absolute.
For more cf. copula.
Nouns
Nominative/ergative
Genitive
Partitive
Benefactive
Telic
Locatives
The ending for the locative is -bi, but, like the instrumental, the locative features a semantic allophonic variant. Namely the unvoiced version -pi carries the basic semantic of on or at, while the voiced variant -bi has the semantic in or between. The meanings, when needed, are complimented by certain postpositions.
Examples:
- root bls, "snow":
balášpi áytawon
snow.on run.impf.3.pl
they are running on/along the snow
balážbi áldawon
snow.in play.impf.3.pl
they are playing in the snow
With other phonemes at the end, for instance:
- root mwk, "dog", => plural: mowokín
mwokínpi sarabín
dog.pl.on fleas
there are fleas on dogs (idiomatically the dogs have fleas)
mwokímbi kórowin
dog.pl.on worms
there are worms in dogs (idiomatically, dogs have worms)
Instrumental/comitative
Similative
Adjectives
Verbs
Derivational morphology
Rówok has quite a bit of derivational morphology.
Aspect and tense
There are 2 aspectual infixes and two tense infixes. The language shows main aspect differentiation by ablaut /a/=>/e/ and /o/=>/u/. In the following X represents a dummy vowel in infixes, determined by the vowel quality of the word.
The aspectual infixes are frequentative -ts- and inchoative -sp-. The tense aspects are future -kXy-, and past -rX-. They can theoretically all together be infixed onto a verb, or participle. Grouping the tense aspects gives a special meaning, depending on which comes
so an example with the imperfect active participle of the root ayt- (to run) "yát", meaning a running thing when used in apposition, or a runner when used alone:
- yát - a runner
- yáts - a frequent runner (yát+ts=>yáts)
- yátasp - a beginning runner
- yátkay - a future runner
- yátra - a former runner
now combining:
- yátsasp - a beginning frequent runner
- yatkáyra - a future ex runner (someone who will take it up and quit)
- yatrákay - an ex future runner (someone who showed talent, perhaps, but never lived up to potential)
most perverse:
- yatsaspakáyra - a person who will begin to frequently run but then stop
- yatsasparákay - a person who began to run frequently and then stopped
so the case endings are added to the ends of these forms, just as the verb endings would be added to the end as well, cf:
aytaín (they run, are running) => aytsaín (they frequently run), aytaspaín (they begin running), aytraín (they ran in the past), aytkayaín (they will be running in the future), and of course the possible but ungodly aytsasprakayaín (they were beginning to be about to be running frequently but then didn't)
Diminutives and augmentatives
Diminutives and augmentatives (one of which functions as the comparative as well) are formed through root mutation and suffixation, respectively. As with most all derivational morphology they can be applied to almost all lexical categories.
Diminutives
Diminutives are formed by changing the root’s rightmost possible consonant into its corresponding fricative or affricate according to the chart below. X indicates that the phoneme does not have a possible fricativized variant, e.g. p=>X, since /f/ is lacking in Rówok. In this event the next rightmost consonant is fricativized.
Additionally more than one consonant can be fricativized, for a sort of double diminutive effect, which indicates either extreme smallness or lends a cutesy feel. Cf. root bls-, bálas (snow) => bálaš (snowflake) => varašín (the finest snowflakes you ever saw; powder); or root mwk-, mówok (dog) => mówoč (puppy *one of maaaany words for puppy) => móvoč (cute little puppy doggie)
Augmentatives
Augmentatives are formed through infixes between the root and the case or conjugation endings. In the following /X/ is a dummy vowel determined by the quality of the verb.
The most common are:
- -yXš- = great, grand, noble, relatively large (also functions as a comparative)
- -nXč- = the biggest, greatest
Examples:
- -yXš-
- root mwk, "dog" => mwókyoš, "a big dog"
- root ayt, "run" => ayátyaš, "a long run"
- -nXč-
- root mwk, "dog" => múknuč, "the greatest dog you ever had"
- root ayt, "run" => áytnač, "a marathon"
Syntax
Basics
Constituent order
Word order in Rówok tends in normal circumstances toward SOV, but it's really whatevs.
Number
There are three numbers in Rówok:
- singular
- dual
- plural
Verbs are conjugated for all three numbers, as are participles, nouns, and adjectives declined.
Gender
Person
Agency
A little about agency in Rówok. Below are 6 sentences, the first of each set showing the middle voice and how agency differs between them depending on the semantic of the verb. Then follow provided active and passive examples with the same grammatical subject and main verb just for comparison. Basically it's like this: if the subject of the middle verb is the agent but not (necessarily) the patient, it is marked ergatively/actively; if it is both the agent and patient it is marked absolutively (marked here as "telic" for reasons).
1) root krp- to fight
mowokín kárpŧawan
dog.pl.erg fight.3.pl.MID
the dogs are fighting (each other/amongst themselves)
- +The key being that the dogs are the agents of fighting in a mutual exercise, but not patients, due to the semantics of 'fight'.
mowokín razánka kárpawan
dog.pl.erg bear.tel fight.3.sg.ACT
the dogs are fighting a bear
mwokíngod razánka kárpanak
dog.pl.inst bear.tel fight.3.sg.PAS
the bear is being fought by the dogs
2) root wkd- to kill
mwokínok wokóđowon
dog.pl.tel kill.3.pl.MID
the dogs are killing each other
- +Here the dogs are both agents and patients, doing the killing action, of which they are also patients*
mowokín saráynka wokódowon
dog.pl.erg rabbit.tel fight.3.pl.ACT
the dogs are killing a rabbit
mwokíngod saráynka wokódonok
dog.pl.inst rabbit.tel fight.3.sg.PAS
the rabbit is being killed by the dogs
Noun phrase
Verb phrase
Sentence phrase
Copula
Dependent clauses
Example texts
Idioms
- bálsa belsénkpre, "it is snowing upon fallen snow" = to beat a dead horse; to preach to the choir