Category:Literature: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Language-specific articles should not be tagged with this category. Instead use [[:Category:Language-adjective literature]] and the appropriate genre category, e.g. [[:Category:Language-adjective songs and poems]]. This is for easier future organisation when the amount of literature grows to an amount where language-wise sorting is useful. The sub-categories in turn ''should'' use [[:Category:Literature]].
Language-specific articles should not be tagged with this category. Instead use [[:Category:Language-adjective literature]] and the appropriate genre category, e.g. <nowiki>[[:Category:Language-adjective songs and poems]]</nowiki>. This is for easier future organisation when the amount of literature grows to an amount where language-wise sorting is useful. The sub-categories in turn ''should'' use <nowiki>[[:Category:Literature]]</nowiki>.


Thus we get:
Thus we get:
Line 14: Line 14:


Thus one may browse by either language or by area of interest.
Thus one may browse by either language or by area of interest.
<s>If a work is meritable enough in its own, it should be placed in [[:Category:General literature]]. Works such as nations' constitutions, philosophical treatises, Bible texts, all fit in General lit.</s>


[[:Category:General literature]] should be used for works that do not fit any of the other categories. It is a current catch-all until category pages can be created to fully index the library. The reason for its existence is to avoid littering up this category.
[[:Category:General literature]] should be used for works that do not fit any of the other categories. It is a current catch-all until category pages can be created to fully index the library. The reason for its existence is to avoid littering up this category.