Linguifex talk:Announcements: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Fauxlosophe (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I actually used it mainly as a joke, well aware of the subsequent English pronunciation! ^^ [[File:Waahlis.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Waahlis|<span style="color: Orange;">Waahlis</span>]]''' 21:36, 21 August 2013 (CEST) | I actually used it mainly as a joke, well aware of the subsequent English pronunciation! ^^ [[File:Waahlis.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Waahlis|<span style="color: Orange;">Waahlis</span>]]''' 21:36, 21 August 2013 (CEST) | ||
Fair enough, there's worse titles I suppose.-[[User:Fauxlosophe|Fauxlosophe]] ([[User talk:Fauxlosophe|talk]]) 02:02, 22 August 2013 (CEST) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:02, 22 August 2013
Am I the only one who second guesses linguifices as the best demonym for us? I mean I'm not going full Latin pronunciation here, but I sort of read it as liŋ.ɡwi.fiːsiːz, or at least similar enough to it. -Fauxlosophe (talk) 16:22, 21 August 2013 (CEST)
haha, true, it's not very friendly for illatinate; I believe the use of linguifices in English was a bit of a joke on our part ;) but in generais I think 'conlangers', 'conlangers on Linguifex' are fine enough :p --
Chrysophylax 21:04, 21 August 2013 (CEST)
I actually used it mainly as a joke, well aware of the subsequent English pronunciation! ^^ 
Waahlis 21:36, 21 August 2013 (CEST)
Fair enough, there's worse titles I suppose.-Fauxlosophe (talk) 02:02, 22 August 2013 (CEST)