Minhast: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1,145: Line 1,145:




Note the upper bound is "tenth" ''(erritt)'', not "twentieth", the expected form given Minhast's vegisemal system; instead, this set demonstrates a decimal pattern.  The secondary fractions bear no resemblance to their primary counterparts, having originated from different roots.  Additionally, the verbal forms display some irregularity, as in ''kammak-i-an'' vs the expected ''kammak-an'', ''hadde-ħ-ħan'' instead of the expected ''haddehan'', and ''irt-an'' instead of the expected ''erritt-an''.
Note the upper bound is "tenth" ''(erritt)'', not "twentieth", the expected form given Minhast's vegisemal system; instead, this set demonstrates a decimal pattern.  The secondary fractions bear no resemblance to their primary counterparts, having originated from different roots.  Additionally, the verbal forms display some irregularity, as in ''kammak<span style="font-weight:bold;color:blue">i</span>an'' vs the expected ''kammakan'', ''hadde<span style="font-weight:bold;color:blue">ħ</span>ħan'' instead of the expected ''haddehan'', and ''<span style="font-weight:bold;color:blue">irt</span>an'' instead of the expected ''errittan''.


== Verbs ==
== Verbs ==