Tulvan

Tulvan
Tulvan
Pronunciation	[/'tul.van/]
Created by	Nicolás Campi
Setting	Earth-like planet
Native speakers	Unknown (2012)
Language family	Tuluan Tulvanic Tulvan

Tulvan is a language developed to be to be spoken by humans of an Earth-like planet in the far future in an imaginary time-line. As such, it showcases a very degraded noun morphology, erosion of compounds, relexification and other such traits. A particular characteristic is that words have become more and more specific in their meanings, thus countering a leveling in morphology with a diversification in semantics. The speakers of Tulvan are thought to be in a post-apogee civilization that values culture and scientific knowledge above all, although they still retain some superstitions in their culture.

Introduction

One of the main goals of the language was to experiment with having few to no declensions in a language tending to isolation and analytical morphosyntax. Of course some remnants of an older system remain, so it is not purely one thing or the other, but denotes a state of flux in the language continuum. In comparison to other conlangs of mine it is quite light in declension, only having a marked accusative. Other characteristics are meant to set it apart from common western european languages, such as the use of prefixes for derivation and the use of postpositions being preferred.

Name

The native speakers of the language believe the name Tulvan to derive directly from their word 'tulv' meaning "to think", stating that their language is the best and most efficient way to express thought. This is, of course, highly unlikely, and many experts consider it just a case of folk etymology. The origin of the root of the name is unknown, although archaeological and liguistic studies point towards the ancient use of the endonym Tuluan and the region called Tuluanna as more possible and credible sources of the name. The exact meaning of it remains, as of yet, undetermined.

Phonology

The phonology of Tulvan is not particularly complicated by design. It possesses no affricates or sibilant fricatives, and the velar fricative <c> [x] is becoming indistinguishable from the velar stop <k> [k] in most dialects. The language distinguishes between simple vowels <a, e, i, o, u> and palatalized vowels <ä, ë, ö, ü>, the latter ones not unlike those in Russian or other Slavic languages.

Consonants

	Bilabial	Dental	Palatal	Velar	Uvular	Labio-Velar	Glottal
Stop	p b	t d		k g	q	kw gw	h
Fricative	f v	th [θ]		c [x]		cw [xw]
Sibilant		s z
Nasal	m	n				nw
Liquid		l r
Approximant			y [j]			w

In modern times the series <c, q, k> are merging in many dialects into one single /k/ phoneme, although some also present aspirated variants.

Vowels

	Front	Central	Back
Close	i		u ʲu
Mid	e ʲe		o ʲo
Open		a ʲa

The only distinction in vowels is between regular vowels and palatized ones, these last ones written: <ä, ë, ö, ü>

Grammar

Tulvan is a mostly analytical language, but some remnants of an older case system still remain, for example, in the accusative of nouns. Both pronouns and nouns are inflected for accusative, there's also an adjectival prefix i- to form adjectives from nouns and pronouns. In the case of pronouns they serve to create the possessive adjectives for each person.

The accusative is used in nouns to mark the direct object of a verb. The mark of the accusative in Tulvan is the affix -u. It can sometimes behave as a suffix and sometimes as a prefix. This phenomenon is called allotaxy, and is phonetically conditioned by the letter in which the previous word ends or the next word begins with, wether it is a consonant or a vowel to avoid a combination of C-C or V-V.

For instance, in the sentence cur mem uspär? "Do you want some water?" the u- marks the accusative because mem ends in consonant and spär begins with one. However in a sentence like:

• Levi crumu nus. See an old man! (imperative)

Where crum is "man", it is perfectly valid to put the -u as a suffix. But this could change in a sentence like:

• Lev kwam ucrum nus. I see an old man. (present)

Even though, in this particular case, either prefix or suffix forms are valid, thus lev kwam crumu nus, is also valid. Depending only on personal taste; however in the sentence:

• Lev kwam ucrum ëv nus. I see a man (who) is old.

The preferred choice would be to prefix the accusative to avoid the following vowel. However, in cases where both the previous word ends in a vowel and the next one begins with a vowel the word preceding usually has precedence. Although some dialects can show different patterns or uses.

The only other marker nouns posses is the number marking, the plural. This marker is -n, -en for words ending in a vowel and words ending in a consonant respectively. So a word like utim "tree", would have a plural utimen "trees". This also applies for pronouns and verbs.

• Lev kwam utimen nus. I see the old trees or I look at the old trees.

In fact the distinction between "look" and "see" is made by the pronoun.